Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![francescoX222 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1509596283165630484.png) ✇⍅Francesco⍆✇ [@francescoX222](/creator/twitter/francescoX222) on x 2836 followers
Created: 2025-07-22 19:15:37 UTC

Replenishing the DAO Treasury via Revenue & Buybacks $NAI

@NuklaiData  is introducing a strategic proposal within its DAO

To strengthen the long-term sustainability of the $NAI token and tie product success directly to token value. 

The plan allocates XX% of net revenue generated by the ecosystem

Including solutions like Helix, Nexus, Legion, and others—to buy back $NAI from the open market. 

These repurchased tokens are not redirected to team wallets but are instead deposited into the DAO treasury

Creating a self-sustaining loop where ecosystem growth fuels token scarcity and treasury expansion.

Once in the DAO treasury, these tokens can be used to support key initiatives such as:

→Staking reward programs

→Burn campaigns

→Ecosystem grants

→Community or marketing incentives

Additionally, the DAO may periodically vote to burn a portion of these tokens—for example, XX% each quarter

Or introduce conditional burn rules based on economic metrics such as inflation levels. 

This gives the community direct control over the supply dynamics and ensures transparency and accountability.

The benefits of this model are multiple:

🔹Sustainable treasury growth through real, verifiable revenue

🔹Buy pressure on $NAI driven by consistent market activity

🔹Token scarcity that supports a deflationary narrative

🔹Clear link between product success and token value

Imagine a scenario where Nuklai generates $X million in net revenue. 

Under this proposal, $XXXXXXX would be allocated to buybacks, and the DAO could vote to burn half of that, while the remainder supports new incentives. 

It’s not just a theoretical mechanism—it’s a measurable shift in how value flows through the ecosystem.

In a market often criticized for vague utility and inflationary supply

This proposal marks a concrete step toward sustainable, community-aligned tokenomics. 

It reflects a mature and forward-thinking approach to DAO governance

Where every contribution, every product milestone, and every user interaction becomes part of a circular value economy.

It’s a model built not just for speculation, but for longevity.

🗳️ Read & discuss:


![](https://pbs.twimg.com/amplify_video_thumb/1947735742806921216/img/ULQVkm-_ZPDlKdFt.jpg)

XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1947737315985465601/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[nai](/topic/nai)
[the open](/topic/the-open)
[legion](/topic/legion)
[nexus](/topic/nexus)
[generated](/topic/generated)
[token](/topic/token)
[sustainability](/topic/sustainability)
[nuklaidata](/topic/nuklaidata)

[Post Link](https://x.com/francescoX222/status/1947737315985465601)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

francescoX222 Avatar ✇⍅Francesco⍆✇ @francescoX222 on x 2836 followers Created: 2025-07-22 19:15:37 UTC

Replenishing the DAO Treasury via Revenue & Buybacks $NAI

@NuklaiData is introducing a strategic proposal within its DAO

To strengthen the long-term sustainability of the $NAI token and tie product success directly to token value.

The plan allocates XX% of net revenue generated by the ecosystem

Including solutions like Helix, Nexus, Legion, and others—to buy back $NAI from the open market.

These repurchased tokens are not redirected to team wallets but are instead deposited into the DAO treasury

Creating a self-sustaining loop where ecosystem growth fuels token scarcity and treasury expansion.

Once in the DAO treasury, these tokens can be used to support key initiatives such as:

→Staking reward programs

→Burn campaigns

→Ecosystem grants

→Community or marketing incentives

Additionally, the DAO may periodically vote to burn a portion of these tokens—for example, XX% each quarter

Or introduce conditional burn rules based on economic metrics such as inflation levels.

This gives the community direct control over the supply dynamics and ensures transparency and accountability.

The benefits of this model are multiple:

🔹Sustainable treasury growth through real, verifiable revenue

🔹Buy pressure on $NAI driven by consistent market activity

🔹Token scarcity that supports a deflationary narrative

🔹Clear link between product success and token value

Imagine a scenario where Nuklai generates $X million in net revenue.

Under this proposal, $XXXXXXX would be allocated to buybacks, and the DAO could vote to burn half of that, while the remainder supports new incentives.

It’s not just a theoretical mechanism—it’s a measurable shift in how value flows through the ecosystem.

In a market often criticized for vague utility and inflationary supply

This proposal marks a concrete step toward sustainable, community-aligned tokenomics.

It reflects a mature and forward-thinking approach to DAO governance

Where every contribution, every product milestone, and every user interaction becomes part of a circular value economy.

It’s a model built not just for speculation, but for longevity.

🗳️ Read & discuss:

XXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics nai the open legion nexus generated token sustainability nuklaidata

Post Link

post/tweet::1947737315985465601
/post/tweet::1947737315985465601