[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Adrian Morris [@Adrian_R_Morris](/creator/twitter/Adrian_R_Morris) on x 27.7K followers Created: 2025-07-22 16:32:08 UTC Hang on, you can't make that kind of a claim. A XX% AUM loss in MSTY would absolutely impact its performance | share price. A massive loss of assets would cripple MSTY's ability to efficiently manage its options strategy. It would face higher transaction costs, reduced flexibility to roll positions, etc. which would directly impact its net returns. In that event the fund may be forced into disadvantageous scenarios and be forced be forced to sell assets, which would lower its NAV. This selling pressure would also cause the share price to trade at a significant discount to its underlying value. Also, the fund's ability to generate income is directly tied to its AUM. Halving the assets would halve the income, making it impossible to sustain the same per share distributions without taking on excessive risk or returning capital. On top of that, a XX% outflow would raise serious questions about the fund's long term viability. The new $STRC preferred offering represents a direct competitor for yield seeking investors. It's not just about the per share or per month amount it's also about the sustainability of the model over time and the risk to capital. To suggest that capital fleeing $MSTY for $STRC would have no impact ignores the basic operational realities of an options based ETF. Come on. XX engagements  [Post Link](https://x.com/Adrian_R_Morris/status/1947696172149461244)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Adrian Morris @Adrian_R_Morris on x 27.7K followers
Created: 2025-07-22 16:32:08 UTC
Hang on, you can't make that kind of a claim. A XX% AUM loss in MSTY would absolutely impact its performance | share price. A massive loss of assets would cripple MSTY's ability to efficiently manage its options strategy. It would face higher transaction costs, reduced flexibility to roll positions, etc. which would directly impact its net returns. In that event the fund may be forced into disadvantageous scenarios and be forced be forced to sell assets, which would lower its NAV. This selling pressure would also cause the share price to trade at a significant discount to its underlying value. Also, the fund's ability to generate income is directly tied to its AUM. Halving the assets would halve the income, making it impossible to sustain the same per share distributions without taking on excessive risk or returning capital. On top of that, a XX% outflow would raise serious questions about the fund's long term viability. The new $STRC preferred offering represents a direct competitor for yield seeking investors. It's not just about the per share or per month amount it's also about the sustainability of the model over time and the risk to capital. To suggest that capital fleeing $MSTY for $STRC would have no impact ignores the basic operational realities of an options based ETF. Come on.
XX engagements
