[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  ⬡ The Crypto Panda ⬡ [@TheLinkPanda](/creator/twitter/TheLinkPanda) on x 4720 followers Created: 2025-07-22 14:48:00 UTC Let’s cut the crap. Ripple fanboys love to play word games to dodge the obvious, Ripple doesn’t have to “issue” XRP to completely control it. “All the XRP was created at genesis” XD yeah, no one’s arguing that. What you’re ignoring is that the people who created XRP also founded Ripple, then “gifted” XX% of the supply to their own company. That’s not decentralization, that’s just a clever setup to keep control while pretending you don’t. You don’t need to issue tokens when you already hold the damn mountain. And this idea that “anyone can take XRP” because the ledger doesn’t restrict distribution? Please. It’s nonsense. Ripple holds the majority of XRP, decides when to sell it, and sells it to whoever they want, all while flooding the market with supply every single month through escrow. That’s supply control, that’s market influence, that’s centralization whether you like it or not. Then you’ve got the classic “Ripple is a company, XRP is a token, XRPL is the network” branding spin, as if they’re three separate things. Newsflash, Ripple runs the ecosystem. They’re the only ones building actual tooling. They fund the validator infrastructure. They defend XRP in court. They maintain the default validator list, the UNL. And they’re the only ones institutions talk to. If Ripple vanished tomorrow, so would XX% of the XRP ecosystem. The network might keep ticking, but the liquidity, legal defense, partnerships, and roadmap would evaporate. That’s not decentralization, that’s dependency. You want to argue XRP isn’t a security? Fine. But don’t confuse “not a security” with “decentralized.” Ripple controls the money, Ripple controls the narrative, Ripple controls the trust infrastructure. It’s a company with a token. That’s it. And if you don't get that, you're simply retarded, and that's also okay. Respect for the poor of mind to be trying this game. XX engagements  **Related Topics** [decentralization](/topic/decentralization) [xrp](/topic/xrp) [coins defi](/topic/coins-defi) [coins made in usa](/topic/coins-made-in-usa) [Post Link](https://x.com/TheLinkPanda/status/1947669964128719290)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
⬡ The Crypto Panda ⬡ @TheLinkPanda on x 4720 followers
Created: 2025-07-22 14:48:00 UTC
Let’s cut the crap. Ripple fanboys love to play word games to dodge the obvious, Ripple doesn’t have to “issue” XRP to completely control it.
“All the XRP was created at genesis” XD yeah, no one’s arguing that. What you’re ignoring is that the people who created XRP also founded Ripple, then “gifted” XX% of the supply to their own company. That’s not decentralization, that’s just a clever setup to keep control while pretending you don’t.
You don’t need to issue tokens when you already hold the damn mountain.
And this idea that “anyone can take XRP” because the ledger doesn’t restrict distribution? Please. It’s nonsense. Ripple holds the majority of XRP, decides when to sell it, and sells it to whoever they want, all while flooding the market with supply every single month through escrow. That’s supply control, that’s market influence, that’s centralization whether you like it or not.
Then you’ve got the classic “Ripple is a company, XRP is a token, XRPL is the network” branding spin, as if they’re three separate things. Newsflash, Ripple runs the ecosystem. They’re the only ones building actual tooling. They fund the validator infrastructure. They defend XRP in court. They maintain the default validator list, the UNL. And they’re the only ones institutions talk to.
If Ripple vanished tomorrow, so would XX% of the XRP ecosystem. The network might keep ticking, but the liquidity, legal defense, partnerships, and roadmap would evaporate. That’s not decentralization, that’s dependency.
You want to argue XRP isn’t a security? Fine. But don’t confuse “not a security” with “decentralized.” Ripple controls the money, Ripple controls the narrative, Ripple controls the trust infrastructure.
It’s a company with a token. That’s it. And if you don't get that, you're simply retarded, and that's also okay.
Respect for the poor of mind to be trying this game.
XX engagements
Related Topics decentralization xrp coins defi coins made in usa