[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![KojayWOW Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1421494915612086275.png) KojayWOW [@KojayWOW](/creator/twitter/KojayWOW) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-22 13:56:05 UTC

ANOMA VS FUD
FUD is common, but don't just swallow it raw. Let's discuss:
They say the co founder of Anoma is also the founder of Agoric. And Agoric raised $88M but didn't offer an airdrop. So is it called a scam?
→ Agoric is a project with unique technology
→ Token is live, network is still running
→ Not all projects require airdrops

So, is it a scam? Of course not
→ Tokenomics = Strategy
→ Airdrop = Optional, not a legal promise
→ No airdrop ≠ Rugpull
If everyone who didn't offer an airdrop was considered a scam, XX% of projects would be labeled a SCAM

Anoma ≠ Agoric.
Even though they share the same founders, their vision and technology are very different.
→ Anoma = intent-based coordination layer
→ Focus on privacy + atomic multi chain execution
→ Built from scratch with new cryptographic primitives

Backed by Electric Capital, Delphi, CMCC
If it were a scam, such a large investor base wouldn't be involved touch

@anoma
 isn't just a project
It's a research grade effort to redesign coordination.

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gwd3MIZaUAAdg9f.png)

XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1947656899719221404/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[token](/topic/token)
[stocks technology](/topic/stocks-technology)
[$88m](/topic/$88m)
[agoric](/topic/agoric)
[fud fud](/topic/fud-fud)

[Post Link](https://x.com/KojayWOW/status/1947656899719221404)