Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![0xfrigg Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1661126349191299074.png) Frigg 🌸 [@0xfrigg](/creator/twitter/0xfrigg) on x 78.6K followers
Created: 2025-07-22 09:59:50 UTC

I’ve been deep in @anoma ’s design and the Solver Economy might be one of the most underappreciated shifts in Web3 coordination.

In Anoma, solvers aren’t just passive validators. They’re economic actors competing on how smart their matching strategies are. They decide how intents are bundled, matched, priced, and executed across chains, across users.

Think:
→ DEX solvers optimizing cross-chain liquidity routes
→ DAO solvers bundling governance actions based on dynamic thresholds
→ Auction solvers maximizing bids while preserving privacy

And this isn’t theoretical solvers can build their own matching algos, fee models, and even reputation systems.
Solvers compete, specialize, innovate.
Suddenly, matching itself becomes an economic primitive just like LPs in AMMs or miners in PoW.

With ZK, MPC, and encrypted intents in the mix, we’re entering a world where even matching strategies can be privacy driven.

Private auctions, fair DAOs, cross-chain arbitrage all coordinated by solvers in a decentralized open market.

This flips Web3 coordination on its head. Not validators… not centralized order books… but a solver-driven economy at the heart of on-chain activity.

And honestly?
That’s how you scale coordination beyond chain silos. That’s how you build a permissionless, programmable coordination layer for all Web3.

Anoma isn’t just a new protocol it’s setting the stage for Solvers as Economic Primitives. And I’m genuinely bullish on where this goes.

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwdBjafXoAIn3c8.jpg)

XXXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1947597446764228848/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[web3](/topic/web3)
[anoma](/topic/anoma)

[Post Link](https://x.com/0xfrigg/status/1947597446764228848)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

0xfrigg Avatar Frigg 🌸 @0xfrigg on x 78.6K followers Created: 2025-07-22 09:59:50 UTC

I’ve been deep in @anoma ’s design and the Solver Economy might be one of the most underappreciated shifts in Web3 coordination.

In Anoma, solvers aren’t just passive validators. They’re economic actors competing on how smart their matching strategies are. They decide how intents are bundled, matched, priced, and executed across chains, across users.

Think: → DEX solvers optimizing cross-chain liquidity routes → DAO solvers bundling governance actions based on dynamic thresholds → Auction solvers maximizing bids while preserving privacy

And this isn’t theoretical solvers can build their own matching algos, fee models, and even reputation systems. Solvers compete, specialize, innovate. Suddenly, matching itself becomes an economic primitive just like LPs in AMMs or miners in PoW.

With ZK, MPC, and encrypted intents in the mix, we’re entering a world where even matching strategies can be privacy driven.

Private auctions, fair DAOs, cross-chain arbitrage all coordinated by solvers in a decentralized open market.

This flips Web3 coordination on its head. Not validators… not centralized order books… but a solver-driven economy at the heart of on-chain activity.

And honestly? That’s how you scale coordination beyond chain silos. That’s how you build a permissionless, programmable coordination layer for all Web3.

Anoma isn’t just a new protocol it’s setting the stage for Solvers as Economic Primitives. And I’m genuinely bullish on where this goes.

XXXXXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics web3 anoma

Post Link

post/tweet::1947597446764228848
/post/tweet::1947597446764228848