[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Tccrypto ๐งธ [@Tc_junior1](/creator/twitter/Tc_junior1) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-22 08:21:14 UTC ANOMA SERIES: DAY 5/50โ๏ธ ANOMA Intent vs ETHEREUM Txs Let's break down how @anoma's radical "intent-centric" approach differs from Ethereum's traditional transaction model ๐ปEthereum's Transaction Approach > Like Giving Driving Directions every Ethereum transaction is like giving turn-by-turn navigation: "Call this contract, run this function, then call that contract..." > The VM executes each step exactly as written > Order matters (change the sequence, change the outcome) > Can lead to complex, unpredictable state changes โก๏ธ Developer Headaches Must account for: - ๐๐ข๐ด ๐ค๐ฐ๐ด๐ต๐ด ๐ข๐ต ๐ฆ๐ข๐ค๐ฉ ๐ด๐ต๐ฆ๐ฑ - ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ช๐ข๐ญ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐บ ๐ข๐ต๐ต๐ข๐ค๐ฌ๐ด - ๐๐น๐ข๐ค๐ต ๐ฆ๐น๐ฆ๐ค๐ถ๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฑ๐ข๐ต๐ฉ๐ด ๐ปAnoma's Intent Model > Like Hailing a Self-Driving Cab You just declare your destination: "I want to trade X ETH for the best available BTC price" > Solvers figure out the optimal path > Only succeeds if it finds a complete match > Results in simple yes/no outcomes โก๏ธBuilt-In Advantages - ๐๐ฐ ๐จ๐ข๐ด ๐จ๐ถ๐ฆ๐ด๐ด๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐จ๐ข๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ด - ๐๐ฐ ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ณ๐บ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ข๐ฃ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต ๐ฆ๐น๐ฆ๐ค๐ถ๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ - ๐๐ข๐ต๐ถ๐ณ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ช๐ด๐ต๐ข๐ฏ๐ต ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ต-๐ณ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ This is interesting because Anoma's model will reduce DeFi hacks (no unexpected execution paths), simplify development (focus on what, not how) & enable private transactions (without extra steps) While we need to acknowledge that that Anoma isn't competing with $ETH, anoma provides simplicity and safety by design and will only make ETH work better As blockchain evolves, we may see more protocols adopt this intent-centric philosophy, especially for private & user-friendly applications.  XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [ethereum](/topic/ethereum) [coins layer 1](/topic/coins-layer-1) [Post Link](https://x.com/Tc_junior1/status/1947572631638548591)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Tccrypto ๐งธ @Tc_junior1 on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-22 08:21:14 UTC
ANOMA SERIES: DAY 5/50โ๏ธ
ANOMA Intent vs ETHEREUM Txs
Let's break down how @anoma's radical "intent-centric" approach differs from Ethereum's traditional transaction model
๐ปEthereum's Transaction Approach
Like Giving Driving Directions every Ethereum transaction is like giving turn-by-turn navigation: "Call this contract, run this function, then call that contract..."
The VM executes each step exactly as written
Order matters (change the sequence, change the outcome)
Can lead to complex, unpredictable state changes
โก๏ธ Developer Headaches
Must account for:
๐ปAnoma's Intent Model
Like Hailing a Self-Driving Cab You just declare your destination:
"I want to trade X ETH for the best available BTC price"
Solvers figure out the optimal path
Only succeeds if it finds a complete match
Results in simple yes/no outcomes
โก๏ธBuilt-In Advantages
This is interesting because Anoma's model will reduce DeFi hacks (no unexpected execution paths), simplify development (focus on what, not how) & enable private transactions (without extra steps)
While we need to acknowledge that that Anoma isn't competing with $ETH, anoma provides simplicity and safety by design and will only make ETH work better
As blockchain evolves, we may see more protocols adopt this intent-centric philosophy, especially for private & user-friendly applications.
XXX engagements
Related Topics ethereum coins layer 1
/post/tweet::1947572631638548591