[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  AMK Mapping 🇳🇿 [@AMK_Mapping_](/creator/twitter/AMK_Mapping_) on x 39.4K followers Created: 2025-07-22 08:06:51 UTC I'll never understand how your group follows this war so closely but doesn't admit the true scale of how critical the current situation is. Are you deceiving your followers to maintain a narrative, is it subconscious bias towards Ukraine, or are you just genuinely uninformed? X. You don't even outline Russia's stated goals for the war. This zoomed out map doesn't account for that, and implies they are trying to conquer all of Ukraine which wouldn't make sense for Russia. X. Russia was advancing very, very slowly in 2023, today it has sped up. If you show the map from XX months ago to today, you'll find that most of that area shown as advances in the last XX months actually occurred during these last XX months. X. It doesn't account for Ukrainian losses of both crucial fortifications & cities, and their ever-increasing manpower issues. Sections of the frontline are now largely held by drones, something that is not a good sign in a war of attrition. Ukrainian soldiers and commanders are constantly coming out and speaking of how awful the fighting conditions are, and yet you characterise this by just saying "there are challenges of course". X. It doesn't account for evolving Russian tactics to adapt to the ever-changing situation on the battlefield, which has proven to have had an effect on frontline progress and overall success. X. The Black Sea Fleet still launches missiles at targets in Ukraine during most large-scale missile attacks, which Ukraine still can't effectively counter by the way. X. Russia has been moving away from their strategic bomber fleet since mid-2024 and has since been using missiles other than Kh-101s, such as Kalibrs, Iskander-Ks, Kh-59/69s, Kh-31Ps, Onyx, Kinzhals, and especially Iskanders. Kh-101s are old, slow, and much easier to shoot down compared to most of their counterparts. They also have far more Geran-2 drones at their disposal which do more overall damage than all of these missiles combined, not to mention the constantly increasing production rates. X. I say this over and over again, but the rate of advance in a war of attrition is NOT linear. It changes depending on countless factors, most of which Russia has a clear advantage in. Their current rate of advance does not in any way mean that they will take Ukraine in XX years, or whatever people say now. You seem to map geolocated movements relatively accurately, and bring up critical situations on the tactical level, but for some reason fail to connect this to the larger picture. This isn't 2022 anymore, times have changed, and the war's momentum has been well in favour of Russia for a long time. XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [ukraine](/topic/ukraine) [Post Link](https://x.com/AMK_Mapping_/status/1947569015272181792)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
AMK Mapping 🇳🇿 @AMK_Mapping_ on x 39.4K followers
Created: 2025-07-22 08:06:51 UTC
I'll never understand how your group follows this war so closely but doesn't admit the true scale of how critical the current situation is. Are you deceiving your followers to maintain a narrative, is it subconscious bias towards Ukraine, or are you just genuinely uninformed?
X. You don't even outline Russia's stated goals for the war. This zoomed out map doesn't account for that, and implies they are trying to conquer all of Ukraine which wouldn't make sense for Russia.
X. Russia was advancing very, very slowly in 2023, today it has sped up. If you show the map from XX months ago to today, you'll find that most of that area shown as advances in the last XX months actually occurred during these last XX months.
X. It doesn't account for Ukrainian losses of both crucial fortifications & cities, and their ever-increasing manpower issues. Sections of the frontline are now largely held by drones, something that is not a good sign in a war of attrition. Ukrainian soldiers and commanders are constantly coming out and speaking of how awful the fighting conditions are, and yet you characterise this by just saying "there are challenges of course".
X. It doesn't account for evolving Russian tactics to adapt to the ever-changing situation on the battlefield, which has proven to have had an effect on frontline progress and overall success.
X. The Black Sea Fleet still launches missiles at targets in Ukraine during most large-scale missile attacks, which Ukraine still can't effectively counter by the way.
X. Russia has been moving away from their strategic bomber fleet since mid-2024 and has since been using missiles other than Kh-101s, such as Kalibrs, Iskander-Ks, Kh-59/69s, Kh-31Ps, Onyx, Kinzhals, and especially Iskanders. Kh-101s are old, slow, and much easier to shoot down compared to most of their counterparts. They also have far more Geran-2 drones at their disposal which do more overall damage than all of these missiles combined, not to mention the constantly increasing production rates.
X. I say this over and over again, but the rate of advance in a war of attrition is NOT linear. It changes depending on countless factors, most of which Russia has a clear advantage in. Their current rate of advance does not in any way mean that they will take Ukraine in XX years, or whatever people say now.
You seem to map geolocated movements relatively accurately, and bring up critical situations on the tactical level, but for some reason fail to connect this to the larger picture. This isn't 2022 anymore, times have changed, and the war's momentum has been well in favour of Russia for a long time.
XXXXXX engagements
Related Topics ukraine