[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Shefali Vaidya. 🇮🇳 [@ShefVaidya](/creator/twitter/ShefVaidya) on x 804K followers Created: 2025-07-22 03:10:08 UTC I don’t understand legalese, but what I DO understand is, if the MCOCA court found the exact same evidence perfectly admissible and valid, Mumbai HC finding it non-admissible is a bit of a cruel joke played on the victims. The courts maybe different, but the law and the physical evidence is exactly the same no? So how can there be such widely differing judgements? XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [hc](/topic/hc) [Post Link](https://x.com/ShefVaidya/status/1947494340516843562)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Shefali Vaidya. 🇮🇳 @ShefVaidya on x 804K followers
Created: 2025-07-22 03:10:08 UTC
I don’t understand legalese, but what I DO understand is, if the MCOCA court found the exact same evidence perfectly admissible and valid, Mumbai HC finding it non-admissible is a bit of a cruel joke played on the victims. The courts maybe different, but the law and the physical evidence is exactly the same no? So how can there be such widely differing judgements?
XXXXXX engagements
Related Topics hc