[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![drawandstrike Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::39076082.png) Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit [@drawandstrike](/creator/twitter/drawandstrike) on x 301.4K followers
Created: 2025-07-21 18:22:46 UTC

"By way of forming a consensus relative to the candidacy of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, **leading the Democratic Party (DP), sanctioned use of all administrative levers to remove possibly negative effects of the FBI investigation of the business of THE CLINTON FOUNDATION ++++++++ and the email correspondence of the State Department."

Question for all the legal eagles out there. 

If it's the PRESIDENT and LEADER OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY telling you to use every 'administrative lever' at your disposal to cover up the email paper trail of all the illegal off-the-books shenanigans that Hillary and her crew were doing at the State Dept./Clinton Foundation, does that qualify as OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE?  🤔 

If it's the PRESIDENT HIMSELF telling you to 'remove possibly negative effects' caused by emails at the State Dept./Clinton Foundation so the FBI investigation could end with a successful result for the Clinton campaign, does that make it legal and OK? 

@RonColeman @barnes_law @thevivafrei @SidneyPowell1 @GenFlynn @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash @FBIDDBongino @HarmeetKDhillon


XXXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1947361626224509160/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[dp](/topic/dp)
[barack obama](/topic/barack-obama)
[hillary clinton](/topic/hillary-clinton)

[Post Link](https://x.com/drawandstrike/status/1947361626224509160)