Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![0xfrigg Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1661126349191299074.png) Frigg 🌸 [@0xfrigg](/creator/twitter/0xfrigg) on x 73.2K followers
Created: 2025-07-21 07:12:09 UTC

I’ve been deep into @anoma lately and this part really hit me:

Anoma isn’t just DeFi or privacy tech… it’s literally turning matchmaking into a decentralized protocol.

We’re talking matchmaking as infrastructure, not dApp logic.
Let me break down why this matters

Normally in Web3, every app builds its own matching engine:
→ DEXs have AMMs or order books
→ NFT marketplaces have listings + bids
→ DAOs hardcode governance flows

Result? Siloed, rigid systems that can’t evolve or interoperate.

Anoma flips that.
It turns matchmaking into a network-native primitive handled by solvers, intents, and protocol level logic.

Any app can tap into this.
No need to build a matching engine.
The protocol does the coordination.

It starts with Intents:
Users express what they want in a chain-agnostic, P2P layer.
→ No chain limits
→ Privacy protected (thanks to Ferveo)
→ Open to solvers worldwide

Then come Solvers decentralized matchmakers.
They scan intents, bundle them, and settle them atomically.

Solvers can specialize:
→ DEXes
→ NFT marketplaces
→ P2P services
→ Auctions
→ DAOs

Matching logic?
Defined by Predicates programmatic constraints on each intent.

“Match this trade only if price ≥ $1000.”
“Only match if within 10km.”
“Execute this auction bid if reserve price is met.”

All enforced with ZK privacy using Taiga.

And it’s MEV resistant by design:
Thanks to Ferveo + threshold encryption, solvers can’t frontrun or leak intents.

Perfect for sealed bid auctions, private P2P trades, and sensitive marketplaces.

Oh and it’s cross chain.
With Chimera Chains + Typhon, solvers can bundle intents from different domains and settle them atomically.

→ Multi chain NFT swaps
→ Cross chain lending
→ DAO treasury deals across networks

Some wild use cases I see here:
P2P job matching without platforms
Decentralized rideshare or delivery networks
Confidential dating apps
Community driven auction houses
Cross chain service marketplaces

All coordinated via Anoma.

And devs?
They can tap into SDKs, build on top of third-party solver networks, and skip building matching logic entirely.

Anoma’s opening the door for Coordination as a Service in Web3.

It’s bigger than DeFi.
It’s bigger than privacy.
Anoma’s turning decentralized matchmaking into a core Web3 primitive like TCP/IP did for the Internet.

This changes the coordination game beyond finance.

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwXRlW7XIAEaC7g.jpg)

XXXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1947192859532173758/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[marketplaces](/topic/marketplaces)
[nft](/topic/nft)
[exchanges dexs](/topic/exchanges-dexs)
[web3](/topic/web3)
[protocol](/topic/protocol)
[decentralized](/topic/decentralized)
[coins privacy](/topic/coins-privacy)
[anoma](/topic/anoma)

[Post Link](https://x.com/0xfrigg/status/1947192859532173758)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

0xfrigg Avatar Frigg 🌸 @0xfrigg on x 73.2K followers Created: 2025-07-21 07:12:09 UTC

I’ve been deep into @anoma lately and this part really hit me:

Anoma isn’t just DeFi or privacy tech… it’s literally turning matchmaking into a decentralized protocol.

We’re talking matchmaking as infrastructure, not dApp logic. Let me break down why this matters

Normally in Web3, every app builds its own matching engine: → DEXs have AMMs or order books → NFT marketplaces have listings + bids → DAOs hardcode governance flows

Result? Siloed, rigid systems that can’t evolve or interoperate.

Anoma flips that. It turns matchmaking into a network-native primitive handled by solvers, intents, and protocol level logic.

Any app can tap into this. No need to build a matching engine. The protocol does the coordination.

It starts with Intents: Users express what they want in a chain-agnostic, P2P layer. → No chain limits → Privacy protected (thanks to Ferveo) → Open to solvers worldwide

Then come Solvers decentralized matchmakers. They scan intents, bundle them, and settle them atomically.

Solvers can specialize: → DEXes → NFT marketplaces → P2P services → Auctions → DAOs

Matching logic? Defined by Predicates programmatic constraints on each intent.

“Match this trade only if price ≥ $1000.” “Only match if within 10km.” “Execute this auction bid if reserve price is met.”

All enforced with ZK privacy using Taiga.

And it’s MEV resistant by design: Thanks to Ferveo + threshold encryption, solvers can’t frontrun or leak intents.

Perfect for sealed bid auctions, private P2P trades, and sensitive marketplaces.

Oh and it’s cross chain. With Chimera Chains + Typhon, solvers can bundle intents from different domains and settle them atomically.

→ Multi chain NFT swaps → Cross chain lending → DAO treasury deals across networks

Some wild use cases I see here: P2P job matching without platforms Decentralized rideshare or delivery networks Confidential dating apps Community driven auction houses Cross chain service marketplaces

All coordinated via Anoma.

And devs? They can tap into SDKs, build on top of third-party solver networks, and skip building matching logic entirely.

Anoma’s opening the door for Coordination as a Service in Web3.

It’s bigger than DeFi. It’s bigger than privacy. Anoma’s turning decentralized matchmaking into a core Web3 primitive like TCP/IP did for the Internet.

This changes the coordination game beyond finance.

XXXXXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics marketplaces nft exchanges dexs web3 protocol decentralized coins privacy anoma

Post Link

post/tweet::1947192859532173758
/post/tweet::1947192859532173758