[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Ghost Toast [@Ghost_Toast000](/creator/twitter/Ghost_Toast000) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-20 16:00:49 UTC Modular DA Layer War: @0G_labs vs @eigenlayer vs @celestia 🧠⚔️ Modular blockchain space getting serious now. And the most important backbone in this modular world? Data Availability (DA) 🔥 Without scalable DA, no zk rollup, AI app, or L2 infra can breathe properly. But not all DA layers are the same. I took a close look at 0G Labs, EigenDA & Celestia all solving the same problem with totally different approach, speed, security & mindset. Let’s break it down step by step 👇 1️⃣ Architecture & Core Design • 0G Labs: They’re not just building DA they’re building a full AI-native infra called dAIOS. It’s a mix of DA, storage, and decentralized compute. DA layer is modular, with separate lanes for consensus & storage, and random validator selection to avoid collusion. Feels more like a full blown infra for AI + DeFi + Gaming dApps, not just another DA. • EigenDA: Comes from EigenLayer a middleware built on Ethereum. DA here is handled by a fixed XXX validator DAC (Data Availability Committee) using restaked ETH. It’s tightly tied to Ethereum, acting more like a plug and play DA for ETH rollups. .Celestia: A clean, modular DA only chain using PoS & CometBFT. Exec is totally decoupled they only do ordering + DA. They use DAS (Data Availability Sampling), making it super light node friendly & secure. Supports any sovereign rollup or appchain. 2️⃣ Speed & Throughput 🚀 • 0G Labs: Claims 50+ Gbps throughput. That’s wild if true perfect for AI compute, real time gaming, etc. Independent testing isn’t public yet, but they’re going bold with their infra goals. • EigenDA: Throughput is decent but limited testnet showed XXXX MB/s, though target is 1–10 MB/s. Bound by Ethereum latency + limited validator count. • Celestia: Current throughput XXXX MB/s, but after Ginger upgrade (6 sec block time), they aim to cross X GB/s. Proven in production & tested under real usage. 3️⃣ Latency & Finality • 0G Labs: No dependency on Ethereum = faster confirmations. Exact latency numbers are not out, but design shows focus on ultra low latency suits real time apps. • EigenDA: Stuck with Ethereum’s 12min finality not ideal for real-time or sensitive apps. • Celestia: Block time is 12s now (6s coming). But DA finality still needs a challenge window (10 mins). Faster than EigenDA but still slower than 0G’s aim. 4️⃣ Security & Decentralization • 0G Labs: They use random validator selection = less chance of collusion. It’s built from scratch, so no inherited risk from Ethereum or Cosmos. Still waiting on detailed slashing or punishment rules though. • EigenDA: Security is strong backed by restaked ETH. But validator set is fixed (200 nodes) + no slashing = not great if something goes wrong. • Celestia: Proper PoS with slashing + light node security via DAS. Right now disperser is centralized, but plan to decentralize soon. 5️⃣ Flexibility & Ecosystem Fit • 0G Labs: Independent chain works with anything. Ideal for AI native apps, zk infra, DePIN, gaming, etc. They’re not Ethereum dependent gives them more space to innovate freely. • EigenDA: Built purely for Ethereum L2s. Great if you’re in the ETH ecosystem, but no flexibility outside that. • Celestia: ETH independent & supports everything from Cosmos rollups to Polygon CDK. Very modular, but doesn’t offer builtin compute or storage like 0G. 6️⃣ Real Use Cases & Adoption • 0G Labs: Already working with 300+ projects especially in DeFi, Gaming, AI, and DePIN. Positioning itself as a full stack infra layer for next gen apps, not just rollups. • EigenDA: Mostly focused on ETH rollups. Partners like AltLayer, Caldera using it for cheap DA within Ethereum scope. • Celestia: Backed by strong traction. Over 300+ projects. Helping sovereign chains, rollups (like Optimism), and appchains build light & fast. 🔚 Final Thoughts: 0G = Speed, EigenDA = ETH, Celestia = Modular OG. Pick based on your need.personally, I believe @0G_labs as long runner. #0G_labs #KaitoAI #Yapper  XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [infra](/topic/infra) [coins ai](/topic/coins-ai) [zk](/topic/zk) [blockchain](/topic/blockchain) [celestia](/topic/celestia) [coins layer 1](/topic/coins-layer-1) [coins inj](/topic/coins-inj) [coins pos](/topic/coins-pos) [Post Link](https://x.com/Ghost_Toast000/status/1946963516784845181)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Ghost Toast @Ghost_Toast000 on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-20 16:00:49 UTC
Modular DA Layer War: @0G_labs vs @eigenlayer vs @celestia 🧠⚔️
Modular blockchain space getting serious now.
And the most important backbone in this modular world? Data Availability (DA) 🔥 Without scalable DA, no zk rollup, AI app, or L2 infra can breathe properly.
But not all DA layers are the same.
I took a close look at 0G Labs, EigenDA & Celestia all solving the same problem with totally different approach, speed, security & mindset.
Let’s break it down step by step 👇
1️⃣ Architecture & Core Design • 0G Labs: They’re not just building DA they’re building a full AI-native infra called dAIOS. It’s a mix of DA, storage, and decentralized compute. DA layer is modular, with separate lanes for consensus & storage, and random validator selection to avoid collusion. Feels more like a full blown infra for AI + DeFi + Gaming dApps, not just another DA.
• EigenDA: Comes from EigenLayer a middleware built on Ethereum. DA here is handled by a fixed XXX validator DAC (Data Availability Committee) using restaked ETH. It’s tightly tied to Ethereum, acting more like a plug and play DA for ETH rollups.
.Celestia: A clean, modular DA only chain using PoS & CometBFT. Exec is totally decoupled they only do ordering + DA. They use DAS (Data Availability Sampling), making it super light node friendly & secure. Supports any sovereign rollup or appchain.
2️⃣ Speed & Throughput 🚀 • 0G Labs: Claims 50+ Gbps throughput. That’s wild if true perfect for AI compute, real time gaming, etc. Independent testing isn’t public yet, but they’re going bold with their infra goals.
• EigenDA: Throughput is decent but limited testnet showed XXXX MB/s, though target is 1–10 MB/s. Bound by Ethereum latency + limited validator count.
• Celestia: Current throughput XXXX MB/s, but after Ginger upgrade (6 sec block time), they aim to cross X GB/s. Proven in production & tested under real usage.
3️⃣ Latency & Finality • 0G Labs: No dependency on Ethereum = faster confirmations. Exact latency numbers are not out, but design shows focus on ultra low latency suits real time apps.
• EigenDA: Stuck with Ethereum’s 12min finality not ideal for real-time or sensitive apps.
• Celestia: Block time is 12s now (6s coming). But DA finality still needs a challenge window (10 mins). Faster than EigenDA but still slower than 0G’s aim.
4️⃣ Security & Decentralization • 0G Labs: They use random validator selection = less chance of collusion. It’s built from scratch, so no inherited risk from Ethereum or Cosmos. Still waiting on detailed slashing or punishment rules though.
• EigenDA: Security is strong backed by restaked ETH. But validator set is fixed (200 nodes) + no slashing = not great if something goes wrong.
• Celestia: Proper PoS with slashing + light node security via DAS. Right now disperser is centralized, but plan to decentralize soon.
5️⃣ Flexibility & Ecosystem Fit • 0G Labs: Independent chain works with anything. Ideal for AI native apps, zk infra, DePIN, gaming, etc. They’re not Ethereum dependent gives them more space to innovate freely.
• EigenDA: Built purely for Ethereum L2s. Great if you’re in the ETH ecosystem, but no flexibility outside that.
• Celestia: ETH independent & supports everything from Cosmos rollups to Polygon CDK. Very modular, but doesn’t offer builtin compute or storage like 0G.
6️⃣ Real Use Cases & Adoption • 0G Labs: Already working with 300+ projects especially in DeFi, Gaming, AI, and DePIN. Positioning itself as a full stack infra layer for next gen apps, not just rollups.
• EigenDA: Mostly focused on ETH rollups. Partners like AltLayer, Caldera using it for cheap DA within Ethereum scope.
• Celestia: Backed by strong traction. Over 300+ projects. Helping sovereign chains, rollups (like Optimism), and appchains build light & fast.
🔚 Final Thoughts: 0G = Speed, EigenDA = ETH, Celestia = Modular OG. Pick based on your need.personally, I believe @0G_labs as long runner.
#0G_labs #KaitoAI #Yapper
XXX engagements
Related Topics infra coins ai zk blockchain celestia coins layer 1 coins inj coins pos
/post/tweet::1946963516784845181