[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![JayWisdom12 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1038885849344221186.png) Zero Cool 😎 [@JayWisdom12](/creator/twitter/JayWisdom12) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-20 13:44:54 UTC

Here’s a clear breakdown of the situation surrounding Tulsi Gabbard’s ODNI revelations and the emerging political fallout:

⸻

🧭 What’s the Claim?

Tulsi Gabbard, as Director of National Intelligence, released declassified documents asserting that former Obama administration officials—including Obama himself, Clapper, Brennan, Comey—were involved in a “treasonous conspiracy”. She alleges they manipulated and withheld intelligence to fabricate the Russia-collusion narrative as a way to delegitimize Trump’s 2016 victory  .

Key points:
•Pre-election assessments found no evidence of Russian hacking of voting systems—but were later overridden by January 2017 ICA report including the Steele dossier  .
•Gabbard is referring materials to the DOJ, calling for prosecution of several senior intel figures  .

⸻

⚖️ What Do Opponents Say?
•Sen. Mark Warner dismissed Gabbard’s claims as politically motivated “not competent,” noting the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee had confirmed extensive Russian interference  .
•Rep. Jim Himes and others cite that Mueller and the Senate committee corroborated Russian interference even if vote-count manipulation wasn’t proven; they stress there was no evidence of politicization   .
•Debate continues over whether the intelligence shifts were deliberate fabrications or justified updates based on evolving data.

⸻

📊 Stakes & Fallout
•Partisan tensions are heating up. Trump supports Gabbard, while Democrats warn this distracts from pressing matters like the Epstein files   .
•The broader political battle: legitimacy of intel agencies, limits of declassification authority, and the threshold for prosecuting former officials.

⸻

🧠 Oracle Take
1.Evolving Intelligence Is Not Necessarily Conspiracy
Governments often update assessments as new info emerges. The shift from “no evidence of hacking” to “Russia did intervene via influence ops” fits that pattern.
2.Treason vs. Error vs. Intent
Treason requires deliberate intent to betray a nation—intentional, wrongful, coordinated actions. So far, the documents point to disagreement and evolving intel, not evidence of orchestrated conspiracy.
3.Bipartisan Credibility Counts
With Democratic and Republican oversight committees affirming Russian interference, Gabbard’s framing of a treasonous plot deviates sharply from the mainstream view and needs strong proof—beyond document suppression or narrative corrections.
Path Is Steep
A criminal referral to DOJ is significant—but pressure vs. prosecution differs. It may trigger internal reviews, not necessarily indictments.

⸻

🧾 Bottom Line

Gabbard is relying on internal debates and changing assessments to build a narrative of conspiracy. But mainstream investigations—including bipartisan Senate reviews—confirm Russia’s interference, albeit mainly through information warfare, not vote manipulation.

If you’re echoing “Arrest Obama” or labeling this treason, you still face the same challenge: Show a criminal act, not just ideological bias or intel shifts. Otherwise, it’s a high-stakes memetic gambit, not due process.

⸻


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946929310763565505/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[tulsi gabbard](/topic/tulsi-gabbard)
[gabbard](/topic/gabbard)
[tulsi](/topic/tulsi)

[Post Link](https://x.com/JayWisdom12/status/1946929310763565505)