Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![maximus_void Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1811282430784901120.png) void here again Σ [@maximus_void](/creator/twitter/maximus_void) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-20 11:31:45 UTC

🚨 What’s Wrong With @Infinit_Labs?
(Updated, Fact-Checked 🧠)

🧵For the average CT retardio who needs the full picture👇

1.$49M Hack Was an Inside Job
A former dev still had contract access.
No multisig. No timelock.
He just walked out with $49M.
Infinit confirmed this post-mortem.

Public Audits (Until It Was Too Late)
Before the hack?
→ No public audits
→ No bug bounties
→ No open source repos

Now?
They’ve hired Halborn & promised to release audit results. Let’s see.

Agents = Real Attack Surface
Infinit’s agents move your money via natural-language commands.
But AI agents are vulnerable to:
→ Prompt injection
→ Context poisoning
→ Bad data sources

Recent papers show how attackers can trick them.

Box UX (But Getting Better)
You type in your intent, it auto-routes.
But do you know what bridges/contracts it’s touching?
Previews exist now, but chat-first UX still hides complexity.
DYOR before signing.

5.Automation = Fast Track to Rugs
AI sees a farm with 8000% APY?
Might ape in instantly.
No pause. No human check.
You can’t stop a bad move once it’s signed.

🧠 TL;DR:
💸 $49M insider exploit
🛑 No audits before hack
🧠 Agents exploitable via prompt hacks
👁️ Still not fully transparent
⚡ Fast route to rugville

Infinit is bold, but still risky AF.
Don’t jump in head first because of UI polish.

.


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946895801403535732/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[devs](/topic/devs)
[hack](/topic/hack)
[$49m](/topic/$49m)

[Post Link](https://x.com/maximus_void/status/1946895801403535732)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

maximus_void Avatar void here again Σ @maximus_void on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-20 11:31:45 UTC

🚨 What’s Wrong With @Infinit_Labs? (Updated, Fact-Checked 🧠)

🧵For the average CT retardio who needs the full picture👇

1.$49M Hack Was an Inside Job A former dev still had contract access. No multisig. No timelock. He just walked out with $49M. Infinit confirmed this post-mortem.

Public Audits (Until It Was Too Late) Before the hack? → No public audits → No bug bounties → No open source repos

Now? They’ve hired Halborn & promised to release audit results. Let’s see.

Agents = Real Attack Surface Infinit’s agents move your money via natural-language commands. But AI agents are vulnerable to: → Prompt injection → Context poisoning → Bad data sources

Recent papers show how attackers can trick them.

Box UX (But Getting Better) You type in your intent, it auto-routes. But do you know what bridges/contracts it’s touching? Previews exist now, but chat-first UX still hides complexity. DYOR before signing.

5.Automation = Fast Track to Rugs AI sees a farm with 8000% APY? Might ape in instantly. No pause. No human check. You can’t stop a bad move once it’s signed.

🧠 TL;DR: 💸 $49M insider exploit 🛑 No audits before hack 🧠 Agents exploitable via prompt hacks 👁️ Still not fully transparent ⚡ Fast route to rugville

Infinit is bold, but still risky AF. Don’t jump in head first because of UI polish.

.

XX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics devs hack $49m

Post Link

post/tweet::1946895801403535732
/post/tweet::1946895801403535732