[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  XX ⨻ [@Trappwurld](/creator/twitter/Trappwurld) on x 30.2K followers Created: 2025-07-20 10:20:11 UTC • The past couple of days has been filled with me having discussions with NFT builders (teams) and one of the most concerning factors I keep hammering them on is with the issues of affordability of entry. — In other words, pricing or mint price. My pinned tweet has passed a lot of message before and here I am talking about some similar again. If the vision of your project is to raise capital, then rather start small with high pricing concentrated towards actual “believers of your vision” rather than a large supply with concerning fees that will auto attract FUD and present itself like rug/grift intentions. The lack of adherence to this factor has always ended badly for both the team and investors cos.. — if it mints out and doesn’t pump = rug — doesn’t mint out, supply cut, doesn’t pump = rug — mints outs, pumps but doesn’t hold = rug This is why you need “believers” and why your marketing should be directed towards platforms who have and still push similar motives as you rather than chase the usual “degenerate participants” Why did I bring this here? — It’s simple. I simply love NFTs and building and my passion for it has lead me to always chase the right methods, approaches and initiatives of control with respect to JPEGS on the blockchain. I hope I didn’t ruffle any feathers and this doesn’t come out as an attack. I love everyone, I wanna see us all win but in the right manner of approach always cos we can actually achieve it if we simply do the work. — XX ⨻ XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [mint](/topic/mint) [nft](/topic/nft) [Post Link](https://x.com/Trappwurld/status/1946877793997856845)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
XX ⨻ @Trappwurld on x 30.2K followers
Created: 2025-07-20 10:20:11 UTC
• The past couple of days has been filled with me having discussions with NFT builders (teams) and one of the most concerning factors I keep hammering them on is with the issues of affordability of entry.
— In other words, pricing or mint price.
My pinned tweet has passed a lot of message before and here I am talking about some similar again.
If the vision of your project is to raise capital, then rather start small with high pricing concentrated towards actual “believers of your vision” rather than a large supply with concerning fees that will auto attract FUD and present itself like rug/grift intentions.
The lack of adherence to this factor has always ended badly for both the team and investors cos..
— if it mints out and doesn’t pump = rug — doesn’t mint out, supply cut, doesn’t pump = rug — mints outs, pumps but doesn’t hold = rug
This is why you need “believers” and why your marketing should be directed towards platforms who have and still push similar motives as you rather than chase the usual “degenerate participants”
Why did I bring this here?
— It’s simple. I simply love NFTs and building and my passion for it has lead me to always chase the right methods, approaches and initiatives of control with respect to JPEGS on the blockchain.
I hope I didn’t ruffle any feathers and this doesn’t come out as an attack.
I love everyone, I wanna see us all win but in the right manner of approach always cos we can actually achieve it if we simply do the work.
— XX ⨻
XXXXX engagements
