[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![JBoyce40367 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1866248392516448256.png) Joy Boyce 🧙 [@JBoyce40367](/creator/twitter/JBoyce40367) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-20 10:10:07 UTC

Scrolled through the feed on Limitless today and saw a market asking:
“Will $AAPL be above $XXXXXX by July 18, 20:00 UTC?”
What stood out wasn’t the question it was how people were pricing it.

Despite AAPL showing bullish signs, a heavy chunk of trades leaned toward NO. That got me thinking…
Are traders here factoring in macro fear? Earnings spillover? Or are they just hunting for better risk-reward at the “NO” side?

In traditional options, we call that implied sentiment.
On @trylimitless , you can see it in the order book in real time.

Feels like Limitless might be as much about reading people as reading charts.

Pivot to @wallchain_xyz


XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946875258566578380/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[macro](/topic/macro)
[limitless](/topic/limitless)
[$aapl](/topic/$aapl)
[stocks technology](/topic/stocks-technology)

[Post Link](https://x.com/JBoyce40367/status/1946875258566578380)