[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  NeverSure [@NeverSure_BTC](/creator/twitter/NeverSure_BTC) on x 52.9K followers Created: 2025-07-20 09:31:11 UTC The Omnichain Liquidity Problem (And Why AI Might Actually Solve It) % this is where @NetworkNoya 's approach gets interesting.% managing DeFi positions across multiple chains is honestly exhausting. I've got LP positions on like X different chains right now and keeping track of everything is a nightmare. yields change, pools dry up, bridge costs eat into profits... it's a mess. this is where @NetworkNoya 's approach gets interesting. instead of me manually checking Arbitrum yields vs Polygon vs Base every day, their AI agents are supposedly doing this 24/7 across 10+ chains and 500+ pools. the idea is liquidity flows automatically to where returns are highest after accounting for bridge costs and risks. but here's what I'm watching for: how good is their cross-chain execution actually? bridge aggregators help with costs but there's still slippage and timing issues. and what happens during chain congestion? if Ethereum fees spike and the AI wants to rebalance, does it wait or take the hit? the multi-chain yield farming game has gotten so complex that maybe we do need AI to handle it. I just hope their models account for things like governance risks, protocol upgrades, and those random "oops we got exploited" moments that happen way too often in DeFi. tested their ETH strategy for a week so far and the rebalancing has been pretty smooth, but one week in DeFi is like... nothing. need to see how it handles real volatility. @OptimisticOmni @macofweb  XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [positions](/topic/positions) [coins ai](/topic/coins-ai) [Post Link](https://x.com/NeverSure_BTC/status/1946865459321622715)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
NeverSure @NeverSure_BTC on x 52.9K followers
Created: 2025-07-20 09:31:11 UTC
The Omnichain Liquidity Problem (And Why AI Might Actually Solve It) % this is where @NetworkNoya 's approach gets interesting.%
managing DeFi positions across multiple chains is honestly exhausting. I've got LP positions on like X different chains right now and keeping track of everything is a nightmare. yields change, pools dry up, bridge costs eat into profits... it's a mess.
this is where @NetworkNoya 's approach gets interesting. instead of me manually checking Arbitrum yields vs Polygon vs Base every day, their AI agents are supposedly doing this 24/7 across 10+ chains and 500+ pools. the idea is liquidity flows automatically to where returns are highest after accounting for bridge costs and risks. but here's what I'm watching for: how good is their cross-chain execution actually? bridge aggregators help with costs but there's still slippage and timing issues. and what happens during chain congestion? if Ethereum fees spike and the AI wants to rebalance, does it wait or take the hit? the multi-chain yield farming game has gotten so complex that maybe we do need AI to handle it. I just hope their models account for things like governance risks, protocol upgrades, and those random "oops we got exploited" moments that happen way too often in DeFi. tested their ETH strategy for a week so far and the rebalancing has been pretty smooth, but one week in DeFi is like... nothing. need to see how it handles real volatility.
@OptimisticOmni @macofweb
XXX engagements
