[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Cypress Demanincor [@CDemanincor](/creator/twitter/CDemanincor) on x 45K followers Created: 2025-07-19 23:21:21 UTC Zack, Your response—and the replies in the comments—are exactly why I chose to remove your name. I understand that, being someone who is emotionally invested and active on Twitter, this might have caused some confusion. But removing your name was a professional courtesy. My intention was to prevent people from twisting the tone of my post into something it wasn’t—an attack or a personal jab at you. 👉🏽That’s why I even started the post by agreeing with your original point. From the comments, it’s clear that you’re not even sure who you’re responding to. But my followers and community know my intent is always to provide value. My goal was to avoid fueling unnecessary tribalism. Unfortunately, it’s clear that even without naming you, some people in this space are still too immature to recognize that two people can have a thoughtful conversation without it being about "sides" or winning an argument. Coming from someone who’s put in the work to grow their following, I get why it might be confusing that I chose not to tag you directly. But let’s be CLEAR I’m not here for the unnecessary drama in the comments. I’d suggest that you, and others chiming in, take a moment to approach this with a bit more maturity. Instead of twisting my decision into something negative based on personal bias, consider that it was simply a respectful gesture—not an attack. XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [twitter](/topic/twitter) [Post Link](https://x.com/CDemanincor/status/1946711989918609510)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Cypress Demanincor @CDemanincor on x 45K followers
Created: 2025-07-19 23:21:21 UTC
Zack, Your response—and the replies in the comments—are exactly why I chose to remove your name.
I understand that, being someone who is emotionally invested and active on Twitter, this might have caused some confusion.
But removing your name was a professional courtesy.
My intention was to prevent people from twisting the tone of my post into something it wasn’t—an attack or a personal jab at you.
👉🏽That’s why I even started the post by agreeing with your original point.
From the comments, it’s clear that you’re not even sure who you’re responding to.
But my followers and community know my intent is always to provide value.
My goal was to avoid fueling unnecessary tribalism. Unfortunately, it’s clear that even without naming you, some people in this space are still too immature to recognize that two people can have a thoughtful conversation without it being about "sides" or winning an argument.
Coming from someone who’s put in the work to grow their following, I get why it might be confusing that I chose not to tag you directly.
But let’s be CLEAR I’m not here for the unnecessary drama in the comments.
I’d suggest that you, and others chiming in, take a moment to approach this with a bit more maturity. Instead of twisting my decision into something negative based on personal bias, consider that it was simply a respectful gesture—not an attack.
XXXXXX engagements
Related Topics twitter