Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![DookusRoyal Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::831624392203448321.png) General Grievous 🇺🇸 [@DookusRoyal](/creator/twitter/DookusRoyal) on x 3111 followers
Created: 2025-07-19 19:44:20 UTC

From James Madison to Henry Lee, XX June 1824:

"With a view to this last object, I entirely concur in the propriety of resorting to the sense in which the Constitution was accepted and ratified by the nation. In that sense alone it is the legitimate Constitution. And if that be not the guide in expounding it, there can be no security for a consistent and stable, more than for a faithful exercise of its powers. If the meaning of the text be sought in the changeable meaning of the words composing it, it is evident that the shape and attributes of the Government must partake of the changes to which the words and phrases of all living languages are constantly subject. What a metamorphosis would be produced in the code of law if all its ancient phraseology were to be taken in its modern sense."


From Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson, XX June 1823:

"On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."


Chief Justice Marshall in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824):

"As men, whose intentions require no concealment, generally employ the words which most directly and aptly express the ideas they intend to convey the enlightened patriots who framed our constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said."


Daniel Webster (1840):

Argued that the Constitution must be interpreted in its “common and popular sense – in that sense in which the people may be supposed to have understood it when they ratified the Constitution.”


![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwPqkM_XIAEVRA0.png)

XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946657375928115614/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[henry](/topic/henry)
[james madison](/topic/james-madison)

[Post Link](https://x.com/DookusRoyal/status/1946657375928115614)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

DookusRoyal Avatar General Grievous 🇺🇸 @DookusRoyal on x 3111 followers Created: 2025-07-19 19:44:20 UTC

From James Madison to Henry Lee, XX June 1824:

"With a view to this last object, I entirely concur in the propriety of resorting to the sense in which the Constitution was accepted and ratified by the nation. In that sense alone it is the legitimate Constitution. And if that be not the guide in expounding it, there can be no security for a consistent and stable, more than for a faithful exercise of its powers. If the meaning of the text be sought in the changeable meaning of the words composing it, it is evident that the shape and attributes of the Government must partake of the changes to which the words and phrases of all living languages are constantly subject. What a metamorphosis would be produced in the code of law if all its ancient phraseology were to be taken in its modern sense."

From Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson, XX June 1823:

"On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."

Chief Justice Marshall in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824):

"As men, whose intentions require no concealment, generally employ the words which most directly and aptly express the ideas they intend to convey the enlightened patriots who framed our constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said."

Daniel Webster (1840):

Argued that the Constitution must be interpreted in its “common and popular sense – in that sense in which the people may be supposed to have understood it when they ratified the Constitution.”

XX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics henry james madison

Post Link

post/tweet::1946657375928115614
/post/tweet::1946657375928115614