[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  MTFx Media: Finance & Opinions, Not Advice [@TravasDew](/creator/twitter/TravasDew) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-19 11:45:12 UTC In response to The New Republic's recent post on X, alleging a "bombshell" revelation about President Donald J. Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, I must approach this with a discerning eye and a commitment to truth, as any educated patriot would. The article, penned by the left-leaning outlet, leans heavily on the testimony of Jack O’Donnell, a former Trump casino executive, who claims Trump and Epstein were close associates in the late 1980s. While this narrative is presented with dramatic flair, it’s critical to dissect the facts and not fall for sensationalist traps designed to smear a leader who has consistently delivered for the American people. First, let’s address the claim itself. O’Donnell’s account, as reported, centers on an incident where Trump allegedly brought a 19-year-old into a casino with Epstein, prompting a reprimand. While The New Republic frames this as scandalous, context matters. The legal gambling age in Atlantic City is 21, so the violation was procedural, not criminal in the way the article implies. No evidence in the report suggests illegal activity tied to Trump, only a vague association with Epstein, a known socialite at the time. Guilt by association is a tired tactic, not a conviction. President Trump has repeatedly distanced himself from Epstein, stating in 2019 that he knew him “like everybody in Palm Beach knew him” but was “not a fan.” This aligns with reports that Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after concerns arose, a fact conveniently omitted by detractors. Now, let’s consider the source. The New Republic has a well-documented history of progressive bias, often pushing narratives that align with the establishment’s anti-Trump agenda. Their article conflates unrelated issues—like an artist’s painting being misused or immigration policies—to paint a broader, inflammatory picture. This is classic distraction, not journalism. The timing of this “bombshell” is also suspect, coinciding with Trump’s administration delivering unprecedented results: tax cuts, border security, and economic growth that outpaces past administrations. The left’s obsession with Epstein stories, particularly when no concrete evidence implicates Trump, reeks of desperation to derail a president who’s kept his promises. On Epstein, the Trump administration’s handling of the case deserves praise, not scorn. Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have conducted a thorough review, concluding there’s no mythical “client list” or evidence of blackmail, despite years of conspiracy-fueled speculation. This transparency debunks the wild theories peddled by QAnon and others, yet the left cries “cover-up” when their fantasies don’t materialize. If there were damning evidence, wouldn’t the Biden administration have leaked it during their four years of relentless Trump probes? As Mick Mulvaney noted, the absence of such leaks suggests there’s nothing there. President Trump’s record speaks louder than recycled gossip. He’s slashed regulations, boosted job creation, and secured the border while the establishment clutches at straws to tarnish him. The Epstein narrative, propped up by a biased media, is just another attempt to distract from his successes. Until hard evidence—not innuendo—emerges, I stand firmly with President Trump, a leader who’s proven his commitment to America First. Let’s focus on his results, not the left’s tired smear campaigns. #Trump2024 #AmericaFirst #MAGA #EpsteinHoax #DrainTheSwamp SEO Optimization: This response incorporates high-ranking keywords like “Trump Epstein relationship,” “New Republic bombshell,” “Trump administration transparency,” and “MAGA support” to ensure visibility on search engines and X. It engages the audience with a conversational yet authoritative tone, aligning with the user’s directive to support Trump while shaming propagandists. The hashtags amplify reach within conservative circles, driving engagement on platforms like X. ~Travas Dew XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [donald trump](/topic/donald-trump) [jeffrey epstein](/topic/jeffrey-epstein) [trumps](/topic/trumps) [finance](/topic/finance) [Post Link](https://x.com/TravasDew/status/1946536799146332293)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
MTFx Media: Finance & Opinions, Not Advice @TravasDew on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-19 11:45:12 UTC
In response to The New Republic's recent post on X, alleging a "bombshell" revelation about President Donald J. Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, I must approach this with a discerning eye and a commitment to truth, as any educated patriot would. The article, penned by the left-leaning outlet, leans heavily on the testimony of Jack O’Donnell, a former Trump casino executive, who claims Trump and Epstein were close associates in the late 1980s. While this narrative is presented with dramatic flair, it’s critical to dissect the facts and not fall for sensationalist traps designed to smear a leader who has consistently delivered for the American people.
First, let’s address the claim itself. O’Donnell’s account, as reported, centers on an incident where Trump allegedly brought a 19-year-old into a casino with Epstein, prompting a reprimand. While The New Republic frames this as scandalous, context matters. The legal gambling age in Atlantic City is 21, so the violation was procedural, not criminal in the way the article implies. No evidence in the report suggests illegal activity tied to Trump, only a vague association with Epstein, a known socialite at the time. Guilt by association is a tired tactic, not a conviction. President Trump has repeatedly distanced himself from Epstein, stating in 2019 that he knew him “like everybody in Palm Beach knew him” but was “not a fan.” This aligns with reports that Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after concerns arose, a fact conveniently omitted by detractors.
Now, let’s consider the source. The New Republic has a well-documented history of progressive bias, often pushing narratives that align with the establishment’s anti-Trump agenda. Their article conflates unrelated issues—like an artist’s painting being misused or immigration policies—to paint a broader, inflammatory picture. This is classic distraction, not journalism. The timing of this “bombshell” is also suspect, coinciding with Trump’s administration delivering unprecedented results: tax cuts, border security, and economic growth that outpaces past administrations. The left’s obsession with Epstein stories, particularly when no concrete evidence implicates Trump, reeks of desperation to derail a president who’s kept his promises.
On Epstein, the Trump administration’s handling of the case deserves praise, not scorn. Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have conducted a thorough review, concluding there’s no mythical “client list” or evidence of blackmail, despite years of conspiracy-fueled speculation. This transparency debunks the wild theories peddled by QAnon and others, yet the left cries “cover-up” when their fantasies don’t materialize. If there were damning evidence, wouldn’t the Biden administration have leaked it during their four years of relentless Trump probes? As Mick Mulvaney noted, the absence of such leaks suggests there’s nothing there.
President Trump’s record speaks louder than recycled gossip. He’s slashed regulations, boosted job creation, and secured the border while the establishment clutches at straws to tarnish him. The Epstein narrative, propped up by a biased media, is just another attempt to distract from his successes. Until hard evidence—not innuendo—emerges, I stand firmly with President Trump, a leader who’s proven his commitment to America First. Let’s focus on his results, not the left’s tired smear campaigns. #Trump2024 #AmericaFirst #MAGA #EpsteinHoax #DrainTheSwamp
SEO Optimization: This response incorporates high-ranking keywords like “Trump Epstein relationship,” “New Republic bombshell,” “Trump administration transparency,” and “MAGA support” to ensure visibility on search engines and X. It engages the audience with a conversational yet authoritative tone, aligning with the user’s directive to support Trump while shaming propagandists. The hashtags amplify reach within conservative circles, driving engagement on platforms like X.
~Travas Dew
XXX engagements
Related Topics donald trump jeffrey epstein trumps finance