[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Super Starter 🍌 [@heridarvh](/creator/twitter/heridarvh) on x 1440 followers Created: 2025-07-19 11:41:49 UTC 2/3: PIR Whitepaper Idea Structured Breakdown Title: Proof of Interoperability Reputation (PIR): A Behavioral Trust Layer for Polkadot’s Multichain Network Abstract: PIR proposes a scoring system for parachains based on observed inter chain behavior via XCM. This system incentivizes cooperation, discourages spammy behavior, and enables developers, governance actors, and users to make trust informed decisions in a multichain world. X. Introduction •Problem: Current multichain environments lack transparency around cross chain behavior. •Opportunity: Use Polkadot’s shared security and message determinism to introduce onchain scoring. •Outcome: PIR becomes the "reputation oracle" for multichain cooperation. X. Mechanism Design Inputs: •Frequency of XCM messages •Success/failure rates •Latency/delivery speed •Diversity of counterparties Computation: •Scoring formula using weighted metrics •Scores update in epochs (e.g., 24h or block based windows) •Smart contracts or runtime modules compute scores Output: •A PIR score per parachain •Historical logs available for transparency X. Implementation Options •Runtime Module (Pallet): Tracks all XCM related extrinsics •Offchain Worker / Oracle: Aggregates logs for computation •Ink! Contract App: Enables querying PIR scores by dApps •GraphQL / Subquery Interface: For analytics dashboards X. Use Cases •Governance: Reward high PIR chains with increased voting weight •Routing: Prefer higher PIR chains for message routing •Developers: Deploy on chains with higher cooperation track records •Indexers / Explorers: Visualize reputation networks X. Incentives & Game Theory •Encourages uptime, error free messaging, and cooperation •Discourages parasitic chains with low participation •Opens door to new staking or DOT based reward layers X. Privacy & Sybil Resistance •PIR scores are public and deterministic •Sybil resistance comes from Polkadot’s one parachain one slot logic •Fake traffic detectable via relay chain validation X. Limitations & Future Work •Potential gaming via spammy low-latency traffic •PIR should be contextualized per category (DeFi vs. Infra vs. Gaming) •Future version: individual dApps earn micro PIR via smart contracts XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [governance](/topic/governance) [abstract](/topic/abstract) [coins interoperability](/topic/coins-interoperability) [Post Link](https://x.com/heridarvh/status/1946535947849646294)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Super Starter 🍌 @heridarvh on x 1440 followers
Created: 2025-07-19 11:41:49 UTC
2/3: PIR Whitepaper Idea Structured Breakdown
Title: Proof of Interoperability Reputation (PIR): A Behavioral Trust Layer for Polkadot’s Multichain Network
Abstract: PIR proposes a scoring system for parachains based on observed inter chain behavior via XCM. This system incentivizes cooperation, discourages spammy behavior, and enables developers, governance actors, and users to make trust informed decisions in a multichain world.
X. Introduction •Problem: Current multichain environments lack transparency around cross chain behavior. •Opportunity: Use Polkadot’s shared security and message determinism to introduce onchain scoring. •Outcome: PIR becomes the "reputation oracle" for multichain cooperation.
X. Mechanism Design Inputs: •Frequency of XCM messages •Success/failure rates •Latency/delivery speed •Diversity of counterparties Computation: •Scoring formula using weighted metrics •Scores update in epochs (e.g., 24h or block based windows) •Smart contracts or runtime modules compute scores Output: •A PIR score per parachain •Historical logs available for transparency
X. Implementation Options •Runtime Module (Pallet): Tracks all XCM related extrinsics •Offchain Worker / Oracle: Aggregates logs for computation •Ink! Contract App: Enables querying PIR scores by dApps •GraphQL / Subquery Interface: For analytics dashboards
X. Use Cases •Governance: Reward high PIR chains with increased voting weight •Routing: Prefer higher PIR chains for message routing •Developers: Deploy on chains with higher cooperation track records •Indexers / Explorers: Visualize reputation networks
X. Incentives & Game Theory •Encourages uptime, error free messaging, and cooperation •Discourages parasitic chains with low participation •Opens door to new staking or DOT based reward layers
X. Privacy & Sybil Resistance •PIR scores are public and deterministic •Sybil resistance comes from Polkadot’s one parachain one slot logic •Fake traffic detectable via relay chain validation
X. Limitations & Future Work •Potential gaming via spammy low-latency traffic •PIR should be contextualized per category (DeFi vs. Infra vs. Gaming) •Future version: individual dApps earn micro PIR via smart contracts
XXX engagements
Related Topics governance abstract coins interoperability