[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![0xALTF4 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1658490282005127172.png) ALTF4 [@0xALTF4](/creator/twitter/0xALTF4) on x 71.3K followers
Created: 2025-07-19 11:28:58 UTC

everyone says “multi-chain”
but most apps are just copy-pasted contracts running on different L1s with bridges duct-taped between them

@anoma isn’t playing that game
it’s rewriting how cross-chain coordination actually works

multi-chain apps on Anoma are:

• intent-based
• chain-agnostic
• natively composable across domains

how?

because in Anoma, intents are abstract
they’re not tied to a chain, they’re tied to goals
and solvers match those intents across any domain they can coordinate with

no hardcoded RPCs
no chain-specific logic
no syncing smart contracts across deployments

just pure intent flows that span:

▸ EVM and non-EVM chains
▸ rollups and app-chains
▸ L1s, L2s, and sovereign zones

developers write coordination logic
users express desired outcomes
solvers do the heavy lifting

the result?

one experience
one UX
one logic
across all chains

that’s what “on-chain” should mean in a multi-chain world
@anoma makes it real.

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwN5LwJWYAAZ5H3.jpg)

XXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946532712183148582/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[abstract](/topic/abstract)
[playing](/topic/playing)
[anoma](/topic/anoma)

[Post Link](https://x.com/0xALTF4/status/1946532712183148582)