[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Research & Invest [@R_and_Invest](/creator/twitter/R_and_Invest) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-19 00:36:31 UTC I am very very happy for you. But as we have discussed, whenever Jack speaks to Wall Street or has lunch at Morgan Stanley conference, investors and funds offload the stock. My sense is Hedge funds will still not let it work unless @Jack makes $XYZ more efficient. If @x didn’t need XX% of people, Square/CashApp need to grow 20-25% “faster” top line to support all that staff. In age of AI, LLMs and efficiency, unless they cut expenses, S&P addition won’t change funds and how they think longer term. No one wants to be in bed with someone taking out things like Tidal or whatever the F he is acquiring which is not in the best interest of equity holders. Speaking as a very frustrated shareholder but this is exactly the message I get from shorts/long only guys who never want to own it despite one of the best and most scalable platforms out there. It’s like who here doesn’t want to own $NDAQ Nasdaq or $BLK. It’s the $XYZ many that east coast absolutely despises. I heard they would buy if XX% cut in expenses. And it would not even make a dent in sales growth. XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [coins ai](/topic/coins-ai) [faster](/topic/faster) [wall street](/topic/wall-street) [investment](/topic/investment) [morgan stanley](/topic/morgan-stanley) [stocks financial services](/topic/stocks-financial-services) [$xyz](/topic/$xyz) [stocks bitcoin treasuries](/topic/stocks-bitcoin-treasuries) [Post Link](https://x.com/R_and_Invest/status/1946368520390160588)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Research & Invest @R_and_Invest on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-19 00:36:31 UTC
I am very very happy for you. But as we have discussed, whenever Jack speaks to Wall Street or has lunch at Morgan Stanley conference, investors and funds offload the stock. My sense is Hedge funds will still not let it work unless @Jack makes $XYZ more efficient. If @x didn’t need XX% of people, Square/CashApp need to grow 20-25% “faster” top line to support all that staff. In age of AI, LLMs and efficiency, unless they cut expenses, S&P addition won’t change funds and how they think longer term. No one wants to be in bed with someone taking out things like Tidal or whatever the F he is acquiring which is not in the best interest of equity holders. Speaking as a very frustrated shareholder but this is exactly the message I get from shorts/long only guys who never want to own it despite one of the best and most scalable platforms out there. It’s like who here doesn’t want to own $NDAQ Nasdaq or $BLK. It’s the $XYZ many that east coast absolutely despises. I heard they would buy if XX% cut in expenses. And it would not even make a dent in sales growth.
XXX engagements
Related Topics coins ai faster wall street investment morgan stanley stocks financial services $xyz stocks bitcoin treasuries