[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Certified Stoner 🐻 🐳 [@Adecrypt1](/creator/twitter/Adecrypt1) on x 2529 followers Created: 2025-07-18 19:15:04 UTC How Cysic Network Reduces ZK-Rollup Costs with Proof Aggregation Ethereum Layer 2s (L2s) using ZK-rollups face a critical problem: high proof verification costs. Every ZK-proof must be verified on Ethereum, and gas fees add up fast, especially during network congestion. @cysic_xyz offers a solution: "Proof Aggregation". Instead of submitting each proof individually, Cysic Network bundles multiple proofs into one, drastically cutting Ethereum settlement costs. Here’s how it works: The Problem: ZK-Rollups Are Still Expensive Single-proof verification on Ethereum can cost $5–$50+ depending on gas prices. Rollups like zkSync, StarkNet, and Scroll batch transactions but still need frequent on-chain proof submissions. More users = more proofs = higher costs, which get passed on to L2 users. Cysic’s Solution: Proof Aggregation Instead of sending every proof to Ethereum immediately, Cysic: X. Generates proofs off-chain (cheap and fast). X. Aggregates multiple proofs into a single proof (saving ~80%+ in gas). X. Submits the final proof to Ethereum in one go. Why This Matters for Ethereum L2s - Lower fees for users - Faster finality - Scalability Potential Concerns Slight delay: Aggregation requires waiting for multiple proofs before submission. Trust assumptions: Relies on Cysic’s decentralized prover network (but fraud proofs can help). My Take: A Game Changer for ZK-Rollups @cysic_xyz's approach isn’t just a small optimization. It’s a necessary evolution for ZK-rollups to stay competitive against Optimistic rollups (like Arbitrum and OP Mainnet). Optimistic rollups are cheaper today because they don’t need frequent on-chain proofs. But with Cysic’s aggregation, ZK-rollups could match or even undercut Optimistic rollup costs, while keeping their security advantages. Bottom line: If @cysic_xyz delivers, Ethereum L2s will have a cheaper, faster future, without sacrificing security.  XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [zk](/topic/zk) [decentralized](/topic/decentralized) [ethereum](/topic/ethereum) [coins layer 1](/topic/coins-layer-1) [Post Link](https://x.com/Adecrypt1/status/1946287622764331198)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Certified Stoner 🐻 🐳 @Adecrypt1 on x 2529 followers
Created: 2025-07-18 19:15:04 UTC
How Cysic Network Reduces ZK-Rollup Costs with Proof Aggregation
Ethereum Layer 2s (L2s) using ZK-rollups face a critical problem: high proof verification costs. Every ZK-proof must be verified on Ethereum, and gas fees add up fast, especially during network congestion.
@cysic_xyz offers a solution: "Proof Aggregation".
Instead of submitting each proof individually, Cysic Network bundles multiple proofs into one, drastically cutting Ethereum settlement costs. Here’s how it works:
The Problem: ZK-Rollups Are Still Expensive Single-proof verification on Ethereum can cost $5–$50+ depending on gas prices. Rollups like zkSync, StarkNet, and Scroll batch transactions but still need frequent on-chain proof submissions.
More users = more proofs = higher costs, which get passed on to L2 users.
Cysic’s Solution: Proof Aggregation Instead of sending every proof to Ethereum immediately, Cysic: X. Generates proofs off-chain (cheap and fast). X. Aggregates multiple proofs into a single proof (saving ~80%+ in gas). X. Submits the final proof to Ethereum in one go.
Why This Matters for Ethereum L2s
- Lower fees for users
- Faster finality
- Scalability
Potential Concerns Slight delay: Aggregation requires waiting for multiple proofs before submission. Trust assumptions: Relies on Cysic’s decentralized prover network (but fraud proofs can help).
My Take: A Game Changer for ZK-Rollups @cysic_xyz's approach isn’t just a small optimization. It’s a necessary evolution for ZK-rollups to stay competitive against Optimistic rollups (like Arbitrum and OP Mainnet).
Optimistic rollups are cheaper today because they don’t need frequent on-chain proofs. But with Cysic’s aggregation, ZK-rollups could match or even undercut Optimistic rollup costs, while keeping their security advantages.
Bottom line: If @cysic_xyz delivers, Ethereum L2s will have a cheaper, faster future, without sacrificing security.
XXXXX engagements
Related Topics zk decentralized ethereum coins layer 1