[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Johnking | 𝔽rAI 🦆 🍪 [@johnking_eth](/creator/twitter/johnking_eth) on x 30.6K followers Created: 2025-07-18 17:28:28 UTC NO Hacker YES Portal Recently, a major DeFi platform @GMX_IO was hacked on the @arbitrum network, resulting in the theft of around $XX million in assets! 😵 @PortaltoBitcoin give a great breakdown of how this massive exploit was pulled off. To beat the enemy, you must first understand them! Let’s take a quick look ! 1️⃣ How Did the Hack Happen? GMX V1 has a liquidity pool called GLP, which held assets like ETH, BTC, and USDC deposited by users. The hacker used following method ➡️ Re-entrancy attack This is a technique where a smart contract function is repeatedly called before the balance gets updated, allowing multiple operations to sneak in undetected. Using this, the attacker minted a huge amount of fake GLP tokens (basically like printing unlimited counterfeit vouchers) These fake tokens were then swapped for real assets (ETH, BTC, USDC) and withdrawn. 🫣 Finally, the stolen funds were bridged out to other networks like Ethereum mainnet. here is eayy to say They printed fake receipts, exchanged them for real money, and vanished. 2️⃣ Why Was This Attack Successful? GMX V1 was built using a typical DeFi architecture Shared liquidity pool: All user assets are stored in a single contract. Mint/Burn LP tokens: Used to track liquidity provisioning. Complex on-chain logic: Handles balances, swaps, liquidation, and more within the same contract. This tightly coupled design leaves it vulnerable to re-entrancy attacks where a hacker can sneak in repeated calls before the system updates balances. Even though GMX went through multiple audits, design-level risks like pooled funds + complex logic + re-entrancy vulnerability still remained So, while audits can reduce bugs, they can’t eliminate structural weaknesses and that’s what led to this disaster. 🥲 3️⃣ How Could This Have Been Prevented? The answer lies in what @PortaltoBitcoin is building Atomic Swaps Here’s how Atomic Swaps differ: ❌ No liquidity pools. ✅ Assets stay in your wallet. ✅ The swap only executes if all conditions are met. ✅ If anything fails, your funds automatically return. ✅ No contract needs to hold funds or update state With this setups 1⃣There’s no vault to rob 2⃣No fake tokens can be minted 3⃣And re-entrancy attacks become impossible It’s basically the ultimate shield against hackers! With DeFi hacks on the rise, many projects are now moving toward this kind of architecture Atomic swaps, self-custody of user assets, and re-entrancy-proof designs That’s why the future is looking so bright for @PortaltoBitcoin  XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [happened](/topic/happened) [v1](/topic/v1) [gmx](/topic/gmx) [hack](/topic/hack) [gmxio](/topic/gmxio) [Post Link](https://x.com/johnking_eth/status/1946260797354877147)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Johnking | 𝔽rAI 🦆 🍪 @johnking_eth on x 30.6K followers
Created: 2025-07-18 17:28:28 UTC
NO Hacker YES Portal
Recently, a major DeFi platform @GMX_IO was hacked on the @arbitrum network, resulting in the theft of around $XX million in assets! 😵
@PortaltoBitcoin give a great breakdown of how this massive exploit was pulled off.
To beat the enemy, you must first understand them! Let’s take a quick look !
1️⃣ How Did the Hack Happen?
GMX V1 has a liquidity pool called GLP, which held assets like ETH, BTC, and USDC deposited by users.
The hacker used following method ➡️ Re-entrancy attack This is a technique where a smart contract function is repeatedly called before the balance gets updated, allowing multiple operations to sneak in undetected. Using this, the attacker minted a huge amount of fake GLP tokens (basically like printing unlimited counterfeit vouchers)
These fake tokens were then swapped for real assets (ETH, BTC, USDC) and withdrawn. 🫣
Finally, the stolen funds were bridged out to other networks like Ethereum mainnet.
here is eayy to say They printed fake receipts, exchanged them for real money, and vanished.
2️⃣ Why Was This Attack Successful? GMX V1 was built using a typical DeFi architecture
Shared liquidity pool: All user assets are stored in a single contract. Mint/Burn LP tokens: Used to track liquidity provisioning. Complex on-chain logic: Handles balances, swaps, liquidation, and more within the same contract.
This tightly coupled design leaves it vulnerable to re-entrancy attacks where a hacker can sneak in repeated calls before the system updates balances.
Even though GMX went through multiple audits, design-level risks like pooled funds + complex logic + re-entrancy vulnerability still remained
So, while audits can reduce bugs, they can’t eliminate structural weaknesses and that’s what led to this disaster. 🥲
3️⃣ How Could This Have Been Prevented?
The answer lies in what @PortaltoBitcoin is building Atomic Swaps
Here’s how Atomic Swaps differ:
❌ No liquidity pools. ✅ Assets stay in your wallet. ✅ The swap only executes if all conditions are met. ✅ If anything fails, your funds automatically return. ✅ No contract needs to hold funds or update state
With this setups 1⃣There’s no vault to rob 2⃣No fake tokens can be minted 3⃣And re-entrancy attacks become impossible
It’s basically the ultimate shield against hackers!
With DeFi hacks on the rise, many projects are now moving toward this kind of architecture Atomic swaps, self-custody of user assets, and re-entrancy-proof designs
That’s why the future is looking so bright for @PortaltoBitcoin
XXXXX engagements
