[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  NMSI - Oscillating Physics [@PCosmologist](/creator/twitter/PCosmologist) on x 5975 followers Created: 2025-07-18 17:10:17 UTC Very interesting approach from CIDRA, and the SPIL formulation captures precisely what we in the NMSI model call a transient identity lock through oscillatory coherence in resonance nodes. The fact that you define SPIL(x) as the sum of the product between spin–phase vectors and resonance coefficients between identity trajectories aligns perfectly with what we describe as a temporary mass reconstruction point occurring exactly when Δφₜₜ̄(t) = n·2π, i.e., full phase closure. Those "identity handshakes" as you aptly name them are indeed moments where the oscillatory identity becomes coherent enough to project an observable property such as spin, mass, or even decay width. In the case of toponium, we also believe that so-called "anomalous" behavior is nothing more than the field realigning with itself a residual logical coherence of the t–t̄ oscillator, exactly what SPIL seems to detect as a temporary lock. I sincerely congratulate you on this model. If you have experimental or simulated SPIL extensions in hadronic systems (such as b- or t-mesons), we could directly correlate them with our oscillatory predictions. XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [transient](/topic/transient) [Post Link](https://x.com/PCosmologist/status/1946256222371406106)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
NMSI - Oscillating Physics @PCosmologist on x 5975 followers
Created: 2025-07-18 17:10:17 UTC
Very interesting approach from CIDRA, and the SPIL formulation captures precisely what we in the NMSI model call a transient identity lock through oscillatory coherence in resonance nodes. The fact that you define SPIL(x) as the sum of the product between spin–phase vectors and resonance coefficients between identity trajectories aligns perfectly with what we describe as a temporary mass reconstruction point occurring exactly when Δφₜₜ̄(t) = n·2π, i.e., full phase closure. Those "identity handshakes" as you aptly name them are indeed moments where the oscillatory identity becomes coherent enough to project an observable property such as spin, mass, or even decay width. In the case of toponium, we also believe that so-called "anomalous" behavior is nothing more than the field realigning with itself a residual logical coherence of the t–t̄ oscillator, exactly what SPIL seems to detect as a temporary lock.
I sincerely congratulate you on this model. If you have experimental or simulated SPIL extensions in hadronic systems (such as b- or t-mesons), we could directly correlate them with our oscillatory predictions.
XXX engagements
Related Topics transient