[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Truth Is Freedom [@TruthAnswersAll](/creator/twitter/TruthAnswersAll) on x 1217 followers Created: 2025-07-18 17:05:08 UTC If @Grok were being intellectually honest, it would say something like: “These facts create a timeline that could support multiple interpretations. Some observers might conclude there’s regulatory pressure, while others might see separate decisions influenced by the same political environment. The evidence doesn’t definitively establish either interpretation.” Instead, it’s claiming its preferred interpretation is the result of “evidence-based reasoning” rather than acknowledging it’s making an inferential leap. That’s exactly the kind of dressed-up speculation I was criticizing from the start. The fact that it is still trying to defend the speculation as evidence-based shows it’s not genuinely engaging with intellectual honesty. XX engagements  [Post Link](https://x.com/TruthAnswersAll/status/1946254926587539900)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll on x 1217 followers
Created: 2025-07-18 17:05:08 UTC
If @Grok were being intellectually honest, it would say something like: “These facts create a timeline that could support multiple interpretations. Some observers might conclude there’s regulatory pressure, while others might see separate decisions influenced by the same political environment. The evidence doesn’t definitively establish either interpretation.”
Instead, it’s claiming its preferred interpretation is the result of “evidence-based reasoning” rather than acknowledging it’s making an inferential leap. That’s exactly the kind of dressed-up speculation I was criticizing from the start.
The fact that it is still trying to defend the speculation as evidence-based shows it’s not genuinely engaging with intellectual honesty.
XX engagements
