[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![crypto_st0rm Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1796639596446613504.png) ST0RM [@crypto_st0rm](/creator/twitter/crypto_st0rm) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-18 16:53:31 UTC

Brother I’m not debating ethics here I’m trying to make money 

Change is good for the eco, good for $BERA price, thus good for LP’s 

If what you’re saying actually happened and you can prove it, and have the legal/capital resources/time and energy to pursue, then go for it, but what if the easier thing to do is to be like water and ride the wave and sentiment momentum shift back up?

Up to you if you want to die on the moral high ground 

The TLDR on my perspective - sure $BGT premium holders to date have been rekt the worst, but premiums should logically bounce since $BGT will still be a significantly better yield bearing asset than $BERA


XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946252002868228198/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[bera](/topic/bera)
[momentum](/topic/momentum)
[Sentiment](/topic/sentiment)
[coins energy](/topic/coins-energy)
[happened](/topic/happened)
[$bera](/topic/$bera)
[money](/topic/money)

[Post Link](https://x.com/crypto_st0rm/status/1946252002868228198)