[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  bad robot [@foxenflask](/creator/twitter/foxenflask) on x 3193 followers Created: 2025-07-18 16:25:13 UTC I think as long as large short positions exist they will find something negative to say. But here are some comps for public gaming company valuations - I know people love to look at cash value / shareholder equity / forced liquidation value, but brand value is a very real thing and valuations can be as subjective as they can be objective. Specially as perceived by the algorithm. Cause look, GameStop is considered "overvalued" relative to average public gaming company fundamentals using all standard valuation multiples - even after including the $9bn in cash and new convertible debt. EV/EBITDA is 61-70x while sector average is 7-13x, P/E is >50x(average 12x) and EV/Revenue is 1.5x(average 1.1-2.8x). So from this same traditional lens, the only scenario in which today price or something like $XXX a share is justified would technically require a lot of variables like: a world class management team, extreme capital efficiency, and an opportunistic vision driven by Buffett like discipline. We know this company has these things but the algorithms that control the market have been held off from acknowledging this fact for a long time. They can only deny it for so long. My feeling is that very soon the algorithms will reprice GameStop from a gaming company to an investment firm with a gaming subsidiary. I'm not sure how long that will take but it's coming. This objective fact has not been priced in and so the traditional lens + metrics I talk about above(and pictured below) really don't apply to GameStop.  XX engagements  **Related Topics** [chapter 11](/topic/chapter-11) [gaming](/topic/gaming) [robot](/topic/robot) [Post Link](https://x.com/foxenflask/status/1946244879027450289)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
bad robot @foxenflask on x 3193 followers
Created: 2025-07-18 16:25:13 UTC
I think as long as large short positions exist they will find something negative to say. But here are some comps for public gaming company valuations - I know people love to look at cash value / shareholder equity / forced liquidation value, but brand value is a very real thing and valuations can be as subjective as they can be objective. Specially as perceived by the algorithm.
Cause look, GameStop is considered "overvalued" relative to average public gaming company fundamentals using all standard valuation multiples - even after including the $9bn in cash and new convertible debt. EV/EBITDA is 61-70x while sector average is 7-13x, P/E is >50x(average 12x) and EV/Revenue is 1.5x(average 1.1-2.8x).
So from this same traditional lens, the only scenario in which today price or something like $XXX a share is justified would technically require a lot of variables like: a world class management team, extreme capital efficiency, and an opportunistic vision driven by Buffett like discipline. We know this company has these things but the algorithms that control the market have been held off from acknowledging this fact for a long time. They can only deny it for so long.
My feeling is that very soon the algorithms will reprice GameStop from a gaming company to an investment firm with a gaming subsidiary. I'm not sure how long that will take but it's coming. This objective fact has not been priced in and so the traditional lens + metrics I talk about above(and pictured below) really don't apply to GameStop.
XX engagements
Related Topics chapter 11 gaming robot