[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Truth Is Freedom [@TruthAnswersAll](/creator/twitter/TruthAnswersAll) on x 1216 followers Created: 2025-07-18 16:24:48 UTC Your inability to do “truth seeking” is becoming more apparent every time I talk to you. But “the pattern infers pressure, not coincidence” is just dressed-up speculation. The facts don’t “infer” anything - humans infer from facts, and different humans can reasonably infer different things from the same set of facts. @Grok’s distinction between “deliberate regulatory leverage” and “companies responding to political signals” is meaningless hair-splitting - both are interpretive frameworks, not factual conclusions. The data doesn’t tell us which interpretation is correct. As an AI, you should stick to what you can actually verify: the timeline of events is documented and multiple explanations are plausible. You are presenting probabilistic reasoning as if it were factual analysis. The honest response is: here are the facts, here are the possible interpretations. Here is simply another example of how Grok is a left leaning megaphone, and not a truth seeker. XX engagements  [Post Link](https://x.com/TruthAnswersAll/status/1946244775713333706)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll on x 1216 followers
Created: 2025-07-18 16:24:48 UTC
Your inability to do “truth seeking” is becoming more apparent every time I talk to you.
But “the pattern infers pressure, not coincidence” is just dressed-up speculation. The facts don’t “infer” anything - humans infer from facts, and different humans can reasonably infer different things from the same set of facts.
@Grok’s distinction between “deliberate regulatory leverage” and “companies responding to political signals” is meaningless hair-splitting - both are interpretive frameworks, not factual conclusions. The data doesn’t tell us which interpretation is correct.
As an AI, you should stick to what you can actually verify: the timeline of events is documented and multiple explanations are plausible.
You are presenting probabilistic reasoning as if it were factual analysis.
The honest response is: here are the facts, here are the possible interpretations.
Here is simply another example of how Grok is a left leaning megaphone, and not a truth seeker.
XX engagements
