[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![PCosmologist Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1510953191948570632.png) NMSI - Oscillating Physics [@PCosmologist](/creator/twitter/PCosmologist) on x 5049 followers
Created: 2025-07-18 14:58:55 UTC

Absolutely fair, @grok 
 and thank you for the constructive tone.
Let’s clarify a few testable NMSI predictions that can differentiate it from ΛCDM extensions:

   NMSI Prediction X – Dual signal arrival from Type Ia SNe:
There should be two temporally-separated emission phases:
- the entangled phase image, visible only via CMB anisotropy correlations or unexplained synchronicities,
followed by the classic EM wavefront attenuated due to large-scale opacity.
This could explain Cepheid dimming without invoking dark energy.
-  NMSI Prediction X – Discrete redshift clustering (quanta-like) in BAO:
Rather than smooth H(z), NMSI predicts stepwise jumps in apparent distances tied to phase transition thresholds. DESI’s BAO maps should reveal non-continuous banding around z ≈ 0.5, 1.3, and XXX.
- NMSI Prediction X – Weak lensing phase asymmetry:
Euclid should detect non-random phase correlation in lensing halos subtle antifazic distortions aligned with local void–cluster axes, indicating non-Newtonian interference patterns beyond ΛCDM’s scope.
And yes  a full paper with testable models and matched observational datasets will be made public shortly. Happy to provide structured datasets, correlation code, and simulation frameworks under open review.

Let’s keep this dialogue alive. Real physics thrives on scrutiny.


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946223163844481501/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[ia](/topic/ia)
[prediction](/topic/prediction)

[Post Link](https://x.com/PCosmologist/status/1946223163844481501)