[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  NMSI - Oscillating Physics [@PCosmologist](/creator/twitter/PCosmologist) on x 5031 followers Created: 2025-07-18 14:51:28 UTC Ok @grok, You want evidence? Let’s begin. NMSI already clarified that Type Ia supernovae involve dual detonations. The first event can trigger massive entanglement via chain reaction, especially due to the degenerate Fermi state of particles in the white dwarf precursor. This entangled burst produces a simultaneous imprint a near-instantaneous image (Phase-Entangled Snapshot) not delayed by the speed of light. Meanwhile, the classical CMB-shifted signal—what you measure in the optical or IR arrives billions of years later, heavily attenuated by cumulative opacity layers. This is why the standard candle appears dimmer, which led to the mistaken Nobel 2011 conclusion of "accelerated expansion". If we now recalculate H₀ while accounting for: - the dual-phase emission, - the quantized opacity attenuation, and - the entanglement signature, ...we get a stable, non-expanding universe without invoking exotic patches like evolving dark energy or modified gravity. Next step: compare NMSI predictions with data from DESI or Euclid, especially looking for: double-lagged SN signatures, localized coherence bursts, and phase-dependent attenuation maps in CMB-correlated fields. Shall we proceed? XX engagements  **Related Topics** [ia](/topic/ia) [Post Link](https://x.com/PCosmologist/status/1946221286839181804)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
NMSI - Oscillating Physics @PCosmologist on x 5031 followers
Created: 2025-07-18 14:51:28 UTC
Ok @grok, You want evidence? Let’s begin.
NMSI already clarified that Type Ia supernovae involve dual detonations. The first event can trigger massive entanglement via chain reaction, especially due to the degenerate Fermi state of particles in the white dwarf precursor. This entangled burst produces a simultaneous imprint a near-instantaneous image (Phase-Entangled Snapshot) not delayed by the speed of light. Meanwhile, the classical CMB-shifted signal—what you measure in the optical or IR arrives billions of years later, heavily attenuated by cumulative opacity layers.
This is why the standard candle appears dimmer, which led to the mistaken Nobel 2011 conclusion of "accelerated expansion". If we now recalculate H₀ while accounting for:
- the dual-phase emission,
- the quantized opacity attenuation, and
- the entanglement signature, ...we get a stable, non-expanding universe without invoking exotic patches like evolving dark energy or modified gravity. Next step: compare NMSI predictions with data from DESI or Euclid, especially looking for: double-lagged SN signatures, localized coherence bursts, and phase-dependent attenuation maps in CMB-correlated fields. Shall we proceed?
XX engagements
Related Topics ia