Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![RX_crypto_ Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1426318522553028610.png) RX [@RX_crypto_](/creator/twitter/RX_crypto_) on x 4716 followers
Created: 2025-07-18 13:27:00 UTC

What’s Happening in the ICM Trenches?

Despite strong fundamentals, the ICM meta is fading while alts make new ATHs. Tokens in the @believeapp ecosystem aren’t meeting expectations—something’s off with how the dynamics are structured.

Standouts in the Trenches:

$Bear @ 93k
•Real product
•MRR > XX% of crypto
•Proven serial entrepreneur

$Cities @ 180k
•Engaging, polished game
•VC-backed, experienced founder

#Faceless @ 80k
•Cutting-edge tech, excellent product
•7x hackathon winners, strong founder

$Cache @ 117k
•Talented, relentless dev
•Unique product with cool tech

$Brix @ 330k
•Wildly successful founder (8-figure ARR)
•Hugely useful product

⸻

Two years ago on ETH, any of these would’ve hit a $5–10M cap. Today, they’re stuck at sub-$500k levels. Why?

The @believeapp flywheel is broken. Valuations feel random. Real builders with real products are overlooked, while others with similar fundamentals trade at 100x valuations.

Tokens like $Dupe, $Kled, $Knet, $Yapper, #Fitcoin, and $Codec face the same issue—if teams and tech are equally strong, why such a valuation disparity?

The dynamics are anti-flywheel.
No real momentum. Occasional pump candles, then down only.

A lot needs fixing. Heavy pressure on @pasternak. If Believe wants its ecosystem to survive, it needs real innovation—and fast.

Right now, the tokenomics are failing builders.


XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946200029120843908/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[$cities](/topic/$cities)
[alts](/topic/alts)
[meta](/topic/meta)
[trenches](/topic/trenches)
[$bear](/topic/$bear)
[coins solana ecosystem](/topic/coins-solana-ecosystem)
[coins meme](/topic/coins-meme)

[Post Link](https://x.com/RX_crypto_/status/1946200029120843908)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

RX_crypto_ Avatar RX @RX_crypto_ on x 4716 followers Created: 2025-07-18 13:27:00 UTC

What’s Happening in the ICM Trenches?

Despite strong fundamentals, the ICM meta is fading while alts make new ATHs. Tokens in the @believeapp ecosystem aren’t meeting expectations—something’s off with how the dynamics are structured.

Standouts in the Trenches:

$Bear @ 93k •Real product •MRR > XX% of crypto •Proven serial entrepreneur

$Cities @ 180k •Engaging, polished game •VC-backed, experienced founder

#Faceless @ 80k •Cutting-edge tech, excellent product •7x hackathon winners, strong founder

$Cache @ 117k •Talented, relentless dev •Unique product with cool tech

$Brix @ 330k •Wildly successful founder (8-figure ARR) •Hugely useful product

Two years ago on ETH, any of these would’ve hit a $5–10M cap. Today, they’re stuck at sub-$500k levels. Why?

The @believeapp flywheel is broken. Valuations feel random. Real builders with real products are overlooked, while others with similar fundamentals trade at 100x valuations.

Tokens like $Dupe, $Kled, $Knet, $Yapper, #Fitcoin, and $Codec face the same issue—if teams and tech are equally strong, why such a valuation disparity?

The dynamics are anti-flywheel. No real momentum. Occasional pump candles, then down only.

A lot needs fixing. Heavy pressure on @pasternak. If Believe wants its ecosystem to survive, it needs real innovation—and fast.

Right now, the tokenomics are failing builders.

XXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics $cities alts meta trenches $bear coins solana ecosystem coins meme

Post Link

post/tweet::1946200029120843908
/post/tweet::1946200029120843908