[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![Baheet_ Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1250437771174367235.png) Baheet [@Baheet_](/creator/twitter/Baheet_) on x 2131 followers
Created: 2025-07-18 13:15:19 UTC

It Depends on what and who you are building for,  OFT supports more chain, costs less and relatively faster, 

ITS on the other hand is  more friendly for developers and has better exposure to Cosmos. 

I feel the two are well balanced in terms of security, if an issuer wants better security for their OFT  token, all they have to do is customise their DVNs.... but Axelar ensures security is always tight no matter the usecase.

Another angle is complex logic execution, ITS beats OFT in this aspect, you can execute complex cross-chain interactions with a single transaction ( courtesy of the Axelar GMP)

OFT also supports this but requires additional developer effort. (Might complicate the Developer experience)

So I will say Lz is best for lightweight cross-chain deployment but Axelar is superior when it comes to executing complex logic.


XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946197088024646136/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[token](/topic/token)
[cosmos](/topic/cosmos)
[faster](/topic/faster)

[Post Link](https://x.com/Baheet_/status/1946197088024646136)