[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  DOH!MER.š¤AS [@DOHMER_](/creator/twitter/DOHMER_) on x 5745 followers Created: 2025-07-18 12:38:46 UTC Great question , and youāre right to raise the concern. But Kaspa was designed from the ground up to address exactly this scalability-centralization tradeoff. Hereās how: X. Efficient Consensus (GhostDAG): Kaspa uses GhostDAG, a blockDAG protocol that allows multiple blocks per second without causing chain splits or orphan storms. This means nodes donāt need to constantly reprocess forks like in Bitcoin under high load ā which massively reduces wasted CPU cycles. X. Compact Block Propagation: Kaspa propagates blocks with very compact metadata (no need for full re-verification of every block like in Bitcoin forks), making bandwidth use extremely efficient even under high TPS. X. Pruning + NIPoPoWs (Non-Interactive Proofs of Proof-of-Work): As you said, pruning helps with storage, but NIPoPoWs let light clients interact with the network securely; this allows for a wide range of devices (even mobile) to validate and use the network without becoming full nodes. X. Fast Rewards = Decentralized Mining: By having XXXXXXX block rewards per day, even small miners can be incentivized to join; reducing reliance on massive pools and helping decentralization on the mining side. X. Rust Rewrite (Ongoing): Kaspa is being rewritten in Rust specifically to optimize performance and further reduce resource consumption per node. TL;DR: Kaspa isnāt scaling by brute force, itās scaling by redesign. Not by increasing centralization, but by innovating protocol efficiency. XX engagements  **Related Topics** [protocol](/topic/protocol) [blockdag](/topic/blockdag) [kaspa](/topic/kaspa) [coins layer 1](/topic/coins-layer-1) [coins pow](/topic/coins-pow) [coins made in usa](/topic/coins-made-in-usa) [Post Link](https://x.com/DOHMER_/status/1946187890481832116)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
DOH!MER.š¤AS @DOHMER_ on x 5745 followers
Created: 2025-07-18 12:38:46 UTC
Great question , and youāre right to raise the concern.
But Kaspa was designed from the ground up to address exactly this scalability-centralization tradeoff. Hereās how:
X. Efficient Consensus (GhostDAG): Kaspa uses GhostDAG, a blockDAG protocol that allows multiple blocks per second without causing chain splits or orphan storms. This means nodes donāt need to constantly reprocess forks like in Bitcoin under high load ā which massively reduces wasted CPU cycles.
X. Compact Block Propagation: Kaspa propagates blocks with very compact metadata (no need for full re-verification of every block like in Bitcoin forks), making bandwidth use extremely efficient even under high TPS.
X. Pruning + NIPoPoWs (Non-Interactive Proofs of Proof-of-Work): As you said, pruning helps with storage, but NIPoPoWs let light clients interact with the network securely; this allows for a wide range of devices (even mobile) to validate and use the network without becoming full nodes.
X. Fast Rewards = Decentralized Mining: By having XXXXXXX block rewards per day, even small miners can be incentivized to join; reducing reliance on massive pools and helping decentralization on the mining side.
X. Rust Rewrite (Ongoing): Kaspa is being rewritten in Rust specifically to optimize performance and further reduce resource consumption per node.
TL;DR: Kaspa isnāt scaling by brute force, itās scaling by redesign. Not by increasing centralization, but by innovating protocol efficiency.
XX engagements
Related Topics protocol blockdag kaspa coins layer 1 coins pow coins made in usa