[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Eric [@Ericweb33](/creator/twitter/Ericweb33) on x 61.8K followers Created: 2025-07-18 12:18:25 UTC Recently, MemeX adjusted its leaderboard criteria no longer basing rank solely on share-of-voice via X, but requiring on‑platform posting, trading, and interaction. That’s more than a tweak it’s a shift from influence to engagement velocity. From my vantage: this illustrates a critical tension in SocialFi. Are you here to produce content or to participate in the system? MemeX just made that line clearer. On one hand, this rule encourages consistent on-ramp activity. On the other, it raises valid concerns around fairness. A veteran user argued the change felt like betrayal because casual users would get left behind . That tells me two things: power-user dynamics are emerging, and platform-level rule shifts can fracture trust if not managed transparently. My take? I respect the direction. MemeX needs active networks to function. But they must maintain predictability and trust. Repeated, opaque rule changes risk devolving what should be a reflexive system into a performative treadmill. If @MemeX_MRC20 intends to scale, they’ll need clear, gradual onboarding that balances grind with grace where core users are rewarded but casual creators aren’t penalized. This isn’t a meme coin play it’s social platform design in motion. And I’ll be watching closely how MemeX balances structure vs spontaneity in the months ahead.  XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [coins socialfi](/topic/coins-socialfi) [leaderboard](/topic/leaderboard) [memex](/topic/memex) [Post Link](https://x.com/Ericweb33/status/1946182768955957631)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Eric @Ericweb33 on x 61.8K followers
Created: 2025-07-18 12:18:25 UTC
Recently, MemeX adjusted its leaderboard criteria no longer basing rank solely on share-of-voice via X, but requiring on‑platform posting, trading, and interaction. That’s more than a tweak it’s a shift from influence to engagement velocity.
From my vantage: this illustrates a critical tension in SocialFi. Are you here to produce content or to participate in the system? MemeX just made that line clearer.
On one hand, this rule encourages consistent on-ramp activity. On the other, it raises valid concerns around fairness. A veteran user argued the change felt like betrayal because casual users would get left behind . That tells me two things: power-user dynamics are emerging, and platform-level rule shifts can fracture trust if not managed transparently.
My take? I respect the direction. MemeX needs active networks to function. But they must maintain predictability and trust. Repeated, opaque rule changes risk devolving what should be a reflexive system into a performative treadmill.
If @MemeX_MRC20 intends to scale, they’ll need clear, gradual onboarding that balances grind with grace where core users are rewarded but casual creators aren’t penalized.
This isn’t a meme coin play it’s social platform design in motion. And I’ll be watching closely how MemeX balances structure vs spontaneity in the months ahead.
XXXXX engagements
Related Topics coins socialfi leaderboard memex