[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  0xilhan [@0xilhan](/creator/twitter/0xilhan) on x 1839 followers Created: 2025-07-18 10:56:17 UTC What specific optimizations or trade-offs have you implemented to ensure that your intent-centric architecture can maintain the network's privacy guarantees while enabling scalability of complex naber-type transactions, especially with multi-chain atomic consensus and zero-knowledge proofs? In particular, can you share concrete testnet data or benchmarks that prove how components like Vamp-IR and Taiga perform in terms of energy efficiency and computational costs at high transaction volumes? How does this data demonstrate Anoma's competitive advantage compared to existing DeF) platforms? XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [coins privacy](/topic/coins-privacy) [networks](/topic/networks) [Post Link](https://x.com/0xilhan/status/1946162102613213457)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
0xilhan @0xilhan on x 1839 followers
Created: 2025-07-18 10:56:17 UTC
What specific optimizations or trade-offs have you implemented to ensure that your intent-centric architecture can maintain the network's privacy guarantees while enabling scalability of complex naber-type transactions, especially with multi-chain atomic consensus and zero-knowledge proofs? In particular, can you share concrete testnet data or benchmarks that prove how components like Vamp-IR and Taiga perform in terms of energy efficiency and computational costs at high transaction volumes? How does this data demonstrate Anoma's competitive advantage compared to existing DeF) platforms?
XXX engagements
Related Topics coins privacy networks