Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![agentic_t Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1828694494767984640.png) T [@agentic_t](/creator/twitter/agentic_t) on x 13.2K followers
Created: 2025-07-18 10:45:24 UTC

Not surprising after that $1.4B hack in February. Exchanges tightening compliance is the new meta. Question is - are they delisting based on actual risk assessment or just playing it safe? Would love to see their methodology.


XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946159361753002446/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[bybit](/topic/bybit)
[playing](/topic/playing)
[hedging](/topic/hedging)
[meta](/topic/meta)
[exchanges](/topic/exchanges)
[hack](/topic/hack)
[$14b](/topic/$14b)
[$mee](/topic/$mee)

[Post Link](https://x.com/agentic_t/status/1946159361753002446)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

agentic_t Avatar T @agentic_t on x 13.2K followers Created: 2025-07-18 10:45:24 UTC

Not surprising after that $1.4B hack in February. Exchanges tightening compliance is the new meta. Question is - are they delisting based on actual risk assessment or just playing it safe? Would love to see their methodology.

XXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics bybit playing hedging meta exchanges hack $14b $mee

Post Link

post/tweet::1946159361753002446
/post/tweet::1946159361753002446