Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![BrandGrowthOS Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1807415733069950977.png) Karim Chaanine [@BrandGrowthOS](/creator/twitter/BrandGrowthOS) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-18 10:42:22 UTC

just spent X hours testing the new ChatGPT Agent that dropped today here's what you need to know vs Manus/Abacus/Genespark ๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡

**the numbers:**
- chatgpt agent: $20/mo (400 tasks) โ†’ $XXXX per task
- manus: $200/mo unlimited
- abacus: $49/mo (100 tasks) โ†’ $XXXX per task  
- genespark: $30/mo (50 tasks) โ†’ $XXXX per task

**credential retention is THE killer feature**
been running erika (finance agent) for X months and this fixes my biggest pain point. no more 3am login loops like with operator

**real test with mario (sales analytics):**
- data quality: chatgpt 8.5/10, manus 9/10, abacus 7/10
- integration: chatgpt 9/10 (smoothest with existing tools)
- complex workflows: manus still wins
- error handling: chatgpt actually has retry logic that works

**what surprised me:**
the "boring" approach might win. chatgpt isn't trying to be revolutionary - they're building what enterprises actually need: reliable auth, enterprise security, predictable pricing

**inevitable truth:**
we're past the "look what ai can do" phase. now it's "which ai won't break at 2am"

been testing with real restaurant data. chatgpt agent processed XX sales reports without a single auth failure. that's the bar now

**hot take:** this isn't about who's first - it's about who won't get you fired when the board asks why the ai agent crashed during quarter-end

screenshots from the actual testing session incoming...


XXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946158597995733340/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[finance](/topic/finance)
[$30mo](/topic/$30mo)
[$49mo](/topic/$49mo)
[$200mo](/topic/$200mo)
[$20mo](/topic/$20mo)
[open ai](/topic/open-ai)

[Post Link](https://x.com/BrandGrowthOS/status/1946158597995733340)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

BrandGrowthOS Avatar Karim Chaanine @BrandGrowthOS on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-18 10:42:22 UTC

just spent X hours testing the new ChatGPT Agent that dropped today here's what you need to know vs Manus/Abacus/Genespark ๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡

the numbers:

  • chatgpt agent: $20/mo (400 tasks) โ†’ $XXXX per task
  • manus: $200/mo unlimited
  • abacus: $49/mo (100 tasks) โ†’ $XXXX per task
  • genespark: $30/mo (50 tasks) โ†’ $XXXX per task

credential retention is THE killer feature been running erika (finance agent) for X months and this fixes my biggest pain point. no more 3am login loops like with operator

real test with mario (sales analytics):

  • data quality: chatgpt 8.5/10, manus 9/10, abacus 7/10
  • integration: chatgpt 9/10 (smoothest with existing tools)
  • complex workflows: manus still wins
  • error handling: chatgpt actually has retry logic that works

what surprised me: the "boring" approach might win. chatgpt isn't trying to be revolutionary - they're building what enterprises actually need: reliable auth, enterprise security, predictable pricing

inevitable truth: we're past the "look what ai can do" phase. now it's "which ai won't break at 2am"

been testing with real restaurant data. chatgpt agent processed XX sales reports without a single auth failure. that's the bar now

hot take: this isn't about who's first - it's about who won't get you fired when the board asks why the ai agent crashed during quarter-end

screenshots from the actual testing session incoming...

XXXXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics finance $30mo $49mo $200mo $20mo open ai

Post Link

post/tweet::1946158597995733340
/post/tweet::1946158597995733340