[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Aespann_jeans [@a1071364](/creator/twitter/a1071364) on x 13.1K followers Created: 2025-07-18 09:36:05 UTC Min Hee-jin's side: "Raising suspicions that ILLIT plagiarized NewJeans is a legitimate expression of opinion, not false" — with TheQoo comment reactions attached Min Hee-jin's side argued in the summary of the defense and the background of this case: 1) the defendant's statements are a legitimate expression of opinion, and 2) even if the defendant's statements are regarded as factual assertions rather than opinion, they are true. They asserted, "The defendant's remarks were a legitimate expression of opinion that could be made as the representative of ADOR and the producer of NewJeans. The defendant's statements are true and not false." Citing examples from online-community comments and news reports, they stated: "The posters and hanbok photo shoots are similar. Their first official appearance and styling were similar. Reactions such as 'It looks like NewJeans' continued because the hair and makeup styling were so alike. ILLIT created many images similar to NewJeans. Concepts, color palettes, backgrounds, subject placement, and compositions were handled in similar ways, leading the public to comment, 'This reminds me of NewJeans,' or 'Since they're under the same HYBE umbrella label, they probably got permission.'" They added: "The album design is also an imitation," "The public first pointed out the similarities in choreography," and "The plaintiff copied NewJeans' planning materials to create the ILLIT planning proposal," asserting, "While planning and producing ILLIT, the plaintiff imitated NewJeans across various elements. It is natural to respect the public's reaction."  XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [stocks defense](/topic/stocks-defense) [newjeans](/topic/newjeans) [Post Link](https://x.com/a1071364/status/1946141916426326169)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Aespann_jeans @a1071364 on x 13.1K followers
Created: 2025-07-18 09:36:05 UTC
Min Hee-jin's side: "Raising suspicions that ILLIT plagiarized NewJeans is a legitimate expression of opinion, not false" — with TheQoo comment reactions attached
Min Hee-jin's side argued in the summary of the defense and the background of this case: 1) the defendant's statements are a legitimate expression of opinion, and 2) even if the defendant's statements are regarded as factual assertions rather than opinion, they are true. They asserted, "The defendant's remarks were a legitimate expression of opinion that could be made as the representative of ADOR and the producer of NewJeans. The defendant's statements are true and not false."
Citing examples from online-community comments and news reports, they stated: "The posters and hanbok photo shoots are similar. Their first official appearance and styling were similar. Reactions such as 'It looks like NewJeans' continued because the hair and makeup styling were so alike. ILLIT created many images similar to NewJeans. Concepts, color palettes, backgrounds, subject placement, and compositions were handled in similar ways, leading the public to comment, 'This reminds me of NewJeans,' or 'Since they're under the same HYBE umbrella label, they probably got permission.'"
They added: "The album design is also an imitation," "The public first pointed out the similarities in choreography," and "The plaintiff copied NewJeans' planning materials to create the ILLIT planning proposal," asserting, "While planning and producing ILLIT, the plaintiff imitated NewJeans across various elements. It is natural to respect the public's reaction."
XXXXXX engagements
Related Topics stocks defense newjeans