[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Comman Man [@CommanGUY](/creator/twitter/CommanGUY) on x 10.3K followers Created: 2025-07-18 08:43:01 UTC Listen to an unbelievable act of the great Indian judiciary: In 1997, the Supreme Court passed a resolution stating that all judges would disclose their assets to the Chief Justice of India. Then in 2005, India implemented the RTI (Right to Information) Act, under which any Indian citizen could request information from the government. In 2007, an RTI application was filed—likely by activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal—asking the Supreme Court to make public the asset details of judges that were submitted to the Chief Justice. The Supreme Court refused to share the information, so the activist approached the Central Information Commission (CIC). The CIC ruled that yes, the Supreme Court would have to disclose this information. But the Supreme Court didn’t stop there. It filed an application in the Delhi High Court arguing that the CIC should not force them to reveal judges’ assets. However, the single-judge bench of the High Court dismissed the Supreme Court’s plea. Still not giving up, the Supreme Court appealed to a three-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. And astonishingly, even the three-judge bench rejected the Supreme Court’s arguments and ordered that judges’ asset details must be made public. Now here comes the most incredible part—the Supreme Court then filed a case in the Supreme Court itself challenging the Delhi High Court’s decision! After years of hearings, in 2019, the Supreme Court finally ruled that if any judge had voluntarily submitted their asset details to the Chief Justice, that information must be made public. However, no judge could be forced to submit such information in the first place. In simple terms: If an honest judge had already disclosed their assets, only that information would be made public. But if a dishonest judge never disclosed anything, you cannot compel them to. So essentially, the Supreme Court won and lost its own case—and to top it off, it has never implemented the part of the verdict that required making even voluntary disclosures public. Till date, the Supreme Court has not released the asset details of a single judge. So, with such a glorious judiciary, if bundles of cash are ever found burned in someone’s house, it’s really not surprising. Why create such a fuss if someone has taken a little bribe? 😂 XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [india](/topic/india) [supreme](/topic/supreme) [Post Link](https://x.com/CommanGUY/status/1946128565310718319)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Comman Man @CommanGUY on x 10.3K followers
Created: 2025-07-18 08:43:01 UTC
Listen to an unbelievable act of the great Indian judiciary:
In 1997, the Supreme Court passed a resolution stating that all judges would disclose their assets to the Chief Justice of India.
Then in 2005, India implemented the RTI (Right to Information) Act, under which any Indian citizen could request information from the government.
In 2007, an RTI application was filed—likely by activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal—asking the Supreme Court to make public the asset details of judges that were submitted to the Chief Justice.
The Supreme Court refused to share the information, so the activist approached the Central Information Commission (CIC). The CIC ruled that yes, the Supreme Court would have to disclose this information.
But the Supreme Court didn’t stop there. It filed an application in the Delhi High Court arguing that the CIC should not force them to reveal judges’ assets. However, the single-judge bench of the High Court dismissed the Supreme Court’s plea.
Still not giving up, the Supreme Court appealed to a three-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. And astonishingly, even the three-judge bench rejected the Supreme Court’s arguments and ordered that judges’ asset details must be made public.
Now here comes the most incredible part—the Supreme Court then filed a case in the Supreme Court itself challenging the Delhi High Court’s decision!
After years of hearings, in 2019, the Supreme Court finally ruled that if any judge had voluntarily submitted their asset details to the Chief Justice, that information must be made public. However, no judge could be forced to submit such information in the first place.
In simple terms: If an honest judge had already disclosed their assets, only that information would be made public. But if a dishonest judge never disclosed anything, you cannot compel them to.
So essentially, the Supreme Court won and lost its own case—and to top it off, it has never implemented the part of the verdict that required making even voluntary disclosures public. Till date, the Supreme Court has not released the asset details of a single judge.
So, with such a glorious judiciary, if bundles of cash are ever found burned in someone’s house, it’s really not surprising.
Why create such a fuss if someone has taken a little bribe? 😂
XXXXXX engagements
