[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  ALPHAWARRIOR [@xAlphaWarriorx](/creator/twitter/xAlphaWarriorx) on x 112.5K followers Created: 2025-07-18 04:30:00 UTC 🚨Let’s correct the record.🚨 First, let me be clear: I personally believe there are many co-conspirators involved with Jeffrey Epstein. That belief is rooted in my conviction that Epstein was part of a blackmail operation, whether knowingly or as a pawn of a third-party intelligence or power network. However, the claim currently circulating that the "Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum" (NPA) proves the existence of additional co-conspirators beyond Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova is FALSE INFORMATION. Let’s be precise: The NPA does not confirm or name co-conspirators beyond those already listed. It does not assert that others do exist, it only allows for the possibility. Here’s the exact language being misrepresented: “In consideration of Epstein's agreement to plead guilty and to provide compensation in the manner described above, if Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova.” Let’s break that down: -The phrase “potential co-conspirators” does not confirm anyone exists beyond the four named. -“Potential” is a legal catch-all that leaves the door open, but it is not affirmative evidence of more. -That clause creates legal protection, not a factual declaration of other participants. Again, I do believe more were involved, but this document is not proof of anyone beyond those listed. When someone presents you a quote as “evidence,” do what I always tell my audience: Trust, but verify. This specific clause is found on Page X of X in the NPA. Image provided below. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Stay sharp. Alpha  XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [jeffrey epstein](/topic/jeffrey-epstein) [Post Link](https://x.com/xAlphaWarriorx/status/1946064891598758145)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
ALPHAWARRIOR @xAlphaWarriorx on x 112.5K followers
Created: 2025-07-18 04:30:00 UTC
🚨Let’s correct the record.🚨
First, let me be clear: I personally believe there are many co-conspirators involved with Jeffrey Epstein. That belief is rooted in my conviction that Epstein was part of a blackmail operation, whether knowingly or as a pawn of a third-party intelligence or power network.
However, the claim currently circulating that the "Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum" (NPA) proves the existence of additional co-conspirators beyond Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova is FALSE INFORMATION.
Let’s be precise: The NPA does not confirm or name co-conspirators beyond those already listed. It does not assert that others do exist, it only allows for the possibility.
Here’s the exact language being misrepresented:
“In consideration of Epstein's agreement to plead guilty and to provide compensation in the manner described above, if Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova.”
Let’s break that down:
-The phrase “potential co-conspirators” does not confirm anyone exists beyond the four named.
-“Potential” is a legal catch-all that leaves the door open, but it is not affirmative evidence of more.
-That clause creates legal protection, not a factual declaration of other participants.
Again, I do believe more were involved, but this document is not proof of anyone beyond those listed.
When someone presents you a quote as “evidence,” do what I always tell my audience:
Trust, but verify.
This specific clause is found on Page X of X in the NPA.
Image provided below.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Stay sharp. Alpha
XXXXXX engagements
Related Topics jeffrey epstein