Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![ReidFirm Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::887174052.png) Christopher Calvin Reid [@ReidFirm](/creator/twitter/ReidFirm) on x 23.2K followers
Created: 2025-07-18 01:45:06 UTC

EXPOSED: The Wall Street Journal’s Malicious, Left-Wing Hit Job on President Trump – How WSJ Knew the Epstein Letter Was a Fabricated Lie, Printed It Anyway to Smear a President Trump, Divide the MAGA Base, and Hand Democrats a Desperate Victory! Here Are The Facts That Exonerate Trump. RETWEET 

The Wall Street Journal, once a bastion of journalistic integrity, has descended into a cesspool of leftist propaganda, knowingly publishing a fake letter linking President Donald J. Trump to Jeffrey Epstein. This isn’t a mistake—it’s a calculated attack. Trump himself warned Rupert Murdoch and Editor Emma Tucker that the letter was a fraud, threatening legal action if they proceeded. Murdoch promised to intervene, but Emma Tucker, clearly driven by a radical agenda, ignored the truth. This wasn’t an oversight; it was a deliberate smear campaign to harm the President and fracture the MAGA base.

Let’s be clear: the WSJ’s opinion page may lean center-right, but its article writers are further left than the New York Times’ most unhinged hacks. This idiotic story reeks of desperation, exploiting the Epstein files to sow distrust among Trump’s supporters. When the MAGA base divides, questioning the President’s integrity based on speculation, Democrats smell blood. They attack with lies and distortions, but here’s the truth: if any evidence tied Trump to Epstein, Obama, Biden, and Kamala would have unleashed it years ago. They had nothing—because there’s nothing. Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago and never visited Epstein Island, unlike over XX Democrat politicians and businessmen caught in that web.

This is all the Democrats have left. Abandoning reason on every issue, they rely on legacy media, entertainment, big tech, and big business to push their narrative. Dan Bongino warned us—there’s no credible undisclosed evidence—but too many ignored him. When we’re united, we crush their machine. When we splinter, attacking Trump with assumptions, they gain ground. The WSJ’s disgusting, filthy rag of a story proves it. #Trump #WSJ #Epstein 
@itslinklauren

RETWEET

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwGp9jGXYAAhBW9.jpg)

XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1946023391133131131/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[maga](/topic/maga)
[jeffrey epstein](/topic/jeffrey-epstein)
[wsj](/topic/wsj)
[donald trump](/topic/donald-trump)
[wall street](/topic/wall-street)
[calvin](/topic/calvin)

[Post Link](https://x.com/ReidFirm/status/1946023391133131131)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

ReidFirm Avatar Christopher Calvin Reid @ReidFirm on x 23.2K followers Created: 2025-07-18 01:45:06 UTC

EXPOSED: The Wall Street Journal’s Malicious, Left-Wing Hit Job on President Trump – How WSJ Knew the Epstein Letter Was a Fabricated Lie, Printed It Anyway to Smear a President Trump, Divide the MAGA Base, and Hand Democrats a Desperate Victory! Here Are The Facts That Exonerate Trump. RETWEET

The Wall Street Journal, once a bastion of journalistic integrity, has descended into a cesspool of leftist propaganda, knowingly publishing a fake letter linking President Donald J. Trump to Jeffrey Epstein. This isn’t a mistake—it’s a calculated attack. Trump himself warned Rupert Murdoch and Editor Emma Tucker that the letter was a fraud, threatening legal action if they proceeded. Murdoch promised to intervene, but Emma Tucker, clearly driven by a radical agenda, ignored the truth. This wasn’t an oversight; it was a deliberate smear campaign to harm the President and fracture the MAGA base.

Let’s be clear: the WSJ’s opinion page may lean center-right, but its article writers are further left than the New York Times’ most unhinged hacks. This idiotic story reeks of desperation, exploiting the Epstein files to sow distrust among Trump’s supporters. When the MAGA base divides, questioning the President’s integrity based on speculation, Democrats smell blood. They attack with lies and distortions, but here’s the truth: if any evidence tied Trump to Epstein, Obama, Biden, and Kamala would have unleashed it years ago. They had nothing—because there’s nothing. Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago and never visited Epstein Island, unlike over XX Democrat politicians and businessmen caught in that web.

This is all the Democrats have left. Abandoning reason on every issue, they rely on legacy media, entertainment, big tech, and big business to push their narrative. Dan Bongino warned us—there’s no credible undisclosed evidence—but too many ignored him. When we’re united, we crush their machine. When we splinter, attacking Trump with assumptions, they gain ground. The WSJ’s disgusting, filthy rag of a story proves it. #Trump #WSJ #Epstein @itslinklauren

RETWEET

XXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics maga jeffrey epstein wsj donald trump wall street calvin

Post Link

post/tweet::1946023391133131131
/post/tweet::1946023391133131131