[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  🇨🇦 NostraThomas #uranium #nuclear #smr [@SloCan68](/creator/twitter/SloCan68) on x 11.3K followers Created: 2025-07-17 22:58:21 UTC HELP from my friends who can break this down for me. #uranium $dml $dnn 🙏 Grok: I can’t give an exact value or share price conversion for Denison’s stake in McClean Lake because it requires non-public financial data, like detailed costs, reserves, or Denison’s internal valuation models. Still, I can walk you through a rough estimate based on what we know. Denison holds a twenty-two point five percent stake in the McClean Lake Joint Venture, which processes about sixteen point nine million pounds of uranium annually. At roughly eighty dollars per pound, that’s about one point three five billion dollars in gross revenue for the project yearly, with Denison’s share being around three hundred four million dollars before costs. The SABRE project at McClean North, a subset of McClean Lake, contributes about eleven point four million dollars annually to Denison’s revenue. Operating costs, royalties, and taxes could cut that significantly—let’s conservatively estimate a net profit margin of twenty percent, so Denison’s net from the whole project might be around sixty million dollars per year. To value their stake, we’d typically apply a multiple to earnings or cash flow, like a price-to-earnings ratio. Uranium miners often trade at ten to twenty times earnings, so let’s use fifteen as a midpoint. That suggests Denison’s McClean Lake stake could be worth roughly nine hundred million dollars (sixty million times fifteen). Denison’s total market cap is currently about seven hundred fifty million dollars (based on roughly four hundred sixty million shares outstanding at one point six three dollars per share). So, the McClean Lake stake could represent a big chunk of their value, but it’s not the only asset—they also own parts of other projects like Wheeler River. Converting that to a share price impact is trickier. If we isolate the nine hundred million dollar valuation for McClean Lake, divide by four hundred sixty million shares, it’s about one point nine six dollars per share attributable to McClean Lake alone. But this doesn’t account for other assets, liabilities, or market factors like sentiment or dilution risks, so it’s not a direct “this is the stock price” number. Denison’s current price of one point six three dollars likely reflects broader operations and market conditions. This is a simplified estimate—real valuation needs detailed cost data and market analysis. Want me to check X for recent sentiment on Denison’s stock or focus on something else, like their other projects? XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [$dnn](/topic/$dnn) [$dml](/topic/$dml) [Post Link](https://x.com/SloCan68/status/1945981429025792040)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
🇨🇦 NostraThomas #uranium #nuclear #smr @SloCan68 on x 11.3K followers
Created: 2025-07-17 22:58:21 UTC
HELP from my friends who can break this down for me. #uranium $dml $dnn 🙏
Grok: I can’t give an exact value or share price conversion for Denison’s stake in McClean Lake because it requires non-public financial data, like detailed costs, reserves, or Denison’s internal valuation models. Still, I can walk you through a rough estimate based on what we know. Denison holds a twenty-two point five percent stake in the McClean Lake Joint Venture, which processes about sixteen point nine million pounds of uranium annually. At roughly eighty dollars per pound, that’s about one point three five billion dollars in gross revenue for the project yearly, with Denison’s share being around three hundred four million dollars before costs. The SABRE project at McClean North, a subset of McClean Lake, contributes about eleven point four million dollars annually to Denison’s revenue. Operating costs, royalties, and taxes could cut that significantly—let’s conservatively estimate a net profit margin of twenty percent, so Denison’s net from the whole project might be around sixty million dollars per year. To value their stake, we’d typically apply a multiple to earnings or cash flow, like a price-to-earnings ratio. Uranium miners often trade at ten to twenty times earnings, so let’s use fifteen as a midpoint. That suggests Denison’s McClean Lake stake could be worth roughly nine hundred million dollars (sixty million times fifteen). Denison’s total market cap is currently about seven hundred fifty million dollars (based on roughly four hundred sixty million shares outstanding at one point six three dollars per share). So, the McClean Lake stake could represent a big chunk of their value, but it’s not the only asset—they also own parts of other projects like Wheeler River. Converting that to a share price impact is trickier. If we isolate the nine hundred million dollar valuation for McClean Lake, divide by four hundred sixty million shares, it’s about one point nine six dollars per share attributable to McClean Lake alone. But this doesn’t account for other assets, liabilities, or market factors like sentiment or dilution risks, so it’s not a direct “this is the stock price” number. Denison’s current price of one point six three dollars likely reflects broader operations and market conditions. This is a simplified estimate—real valuation needs detailed cost data and market analysis. Want me to check X for recent sentiment on Denison’s stock or focus on something else, like their other projects?
XXXXX engagements
/post/tweet::1945981429025792040