[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Crypto Ege [@CryptoEgeHan](/creator/twitter/CryptoEgeHan) on x 160.2K followers Created: 2025-07-17 17:05:41 UTC After all, users can submit similar intents. How will @anoma resolve conflicting intents from multiple users without compromising privacy and network availability if the primary intent is the same? We know that Anoma is not a blockchain, but an intent-based coordination protocol, meaning it aims to process transactions based on users' intentions rather than traditional transactions. According to this logic, there will be no step-by-step process for executing a transaction; the user will simply state what they want to do, and the system will find the most appropriate solution for them. Thanks to Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZK) technology, transactions are conducted confidentially and recorded for verifiability. The reason I ask the question is the possibility of similar intentions. After all, in an intent-matching system, different users can have identical, conflicting requests at the same time. This creates problems that traditional chains cannot solve. Due to Anoma's privacy-focused approach, the content of the intentions is not explicit. Therefore, the question of which intention will take precedence and which match will be made is a concern for me. If two people simultaneously want the same thing, but one offers a higher fee, will the system honor the request of the one who paid the higher fee? If so, how will the request of the one whose request is rejected remain confidential? I hope to gain Anoma Testnet code and spend more days reviewing, tinkering, and interacting with Anoma. #Anoma #anomatestnet @adrianbrink @Chri5H0lt @zjcio @awasunyin @MauriceWbr @chimpfone2047 @thespacecatjr @nimonty_ @thekerukeion @anomafoundation  XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [gib](/topic/gib) [protocol](/topic/protocol) [blockchain](/topic/blockchain) [coins privacy](/topic/coins-privacy) [anoma](/topic/anoma) [Post Link](https://x.com/CryptoEgeHan/status/1945892676789739585)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Crypto Ege @CryptoEgeHan on x 160.2K followers
Created: 2025-07-17 17:05:41 UTC
After all, users can submit similar intents. How will @anoma resolve conflicting intents from multiple users without compromising privacy and network availability if the primary intent is the same?
We know that Anoma is not a blockchain, but an intent-based coordination protocol, meaning it aims to process transactions based on users' intentions rather than traditional transactions.
According to this logic, there will be no step-by-step process for executing a transaction; the user will simply state what they want to do, and the system will find the most appropriate solution for them.
Thanks to Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZK) technology, transactions are conducted confidentially and recorded for verifiability.
The reason I ask the question is the possibility of similar intentions. After all, in an intent-matching system, different users can have identical, conflicting requests at the same time. This creates problems that traditional chains cannot solve. Due to Anoma's privacy-focused approach, the content of the intentions is not explicit. Therefore, the question of which intention will take precedence and which match will be made is a concern for me.
If two people simultaneously want the same thing, but one offers a higher fee, will the system honor the request of the one who paid the higher fee? If so, how will the request of the one whose request is rejected remain confidential?
I hope to gain Anoma Testnet code and spend more days reviewing, tinkering, and interacting with Anoma. #Anoma #anomatestnet
@adrianbrink @Chri5H0lt @zjcio @awasunyin @MauriceWbr @chimpfone2047 @thespacecatjr @nimonty_ @thekerukeion @anomafoundation
XXXXXX engagements
Related Topics gib protocol blockchain coins privacy anoma