Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![polkaworld_org Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1144236763805650944.png) PolkaWorld [@polkaworld_org](/creator/twitter/polkaworld_org) on x 15.8K followers
Created: 2025-07-17 16:07:00 UTC

If we cut @Polkadot's security costs from $500M to $90M — an XX% reduction — and keep the same reward ratio (85:15 for staking vs treasury), treasury inflow drops to just $15.88M/year.

At $5/DOT, that’s only 3.17M DOT/year.

For context?

We spent $28.24M in June alone.

Let that sink in.

That’s why PolkaWorld updated our voting principles last week as we repeatedly reminded everyone during tonight’s proposal livestream:

1/ The $500M → $90M shift gives us a clear signal:

Treasury funds will shrink dramatically.

We must adapt early.

That’s why we’ve refocused on the Treasury’s core mission:

✅ Fund only what’s essential
✅ Prioritize irreplaceable public goods
❌ Say NO to “nice-to-have” or purely promotional proposals

Every ask must now prove its necessity under this lens.

2/ We’ve seen a wave of SDKs and dev tools promising smoother onboarding.

But many of them… barely get used.

Treasury shouldn’t fund tools that might be useful — but never actually are.

Our stance:

🔁 SDKs & UX tools = retroactive funding only.

Build it.
Get real usage.
Then apply for funding with proof.

Protects Treasury capital. Rewards real impact.

3/ On compensation:

We believe maintenance ≠ development, and they should be funded accordingly:

⚠️ Development proposals: max $100/hr
⚠️ Maintenance work: max $30/hr

Anything above = NAY from us.

(We may lower this cap in the future.)

4/ Our ultimate goal?

Long-term sustainability for Polkadot
+
Support for creative, mission-aligned builders

A “NAY” isn’t personal.

It’s not a rejection of your team.

It’s an invitation to improve — and align with the ecosystem’s deeper needs.

Let’s build better. Together. 🫶


XXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1945877908087607383/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[$2824m](/topic/$2824m)
[$5dot](/topic/$5dot)
[$1588myear](/topic/$1588myear)
[drops](/topic/drops)
[staking](/topic/staking)
[$90m](/topic/$90m)
[$500m](/topic/$500m)

[Post Link](https://x.com/polkaworld_org/status/1945877908087607383)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

polkaworld_org Avatar PolkaWorld @polkaworld_org on x 15.8K followers Created: 2025-07-17 16:07:00 UTC

If we cut @Polkadot's security costs from $500M to $90M — an XX% reduction — and keep the same reward ratio (85:15 for staking vs treasury), treasury inflow drops to just $15.88M/year.

At $5/DOT, that’s only 3.17M DOT/year.

For context?

We spent $28.24M in June alone.

Let that sink in.

That’s why PolkaWorld updated our voting principles last week as we repeatedly reminded everyone during tonight’s proposal livestream:

1/ The $500M → $90M shift gives us a clear signal:

Treasury funds will shrink dramatically.

We must adapt early.

That’s why we’ve refocused on the Treasury’s core mission:

✅ Fund only what’s essential ✅ Prioritize irreplaceable public goods ❌ Say NO to “nice-to-have” or purely promotional proposals

Every ask must now prove its necessity under this lens.

2/ We’ve seen a wave of SDKs and dev tools promising smoother onboarding.

But many of them… barely get used.

Treasury shouldn’t fund tools that might be useful — but never actually are.

Our stance:

🔁 SDKs & UX tools = retroactive funding only.

Build it. Get real usage. Then apply for funding with proof.

Protects Treasury capital. Rewards real impact.

3/ On compensation:

We believe maintenance ≠ development, and they should be funded accordingly:

⚠️ Development proposals: max $100/hr ⚠️ Maintenance work: max $30/hr

Anything above = NAY from us.

(We may lower this cap in the future.)

4/ Our ultimate goal?

Long-term sustainability for Polkadot + Support for creative, mission-aligned builders

A “NAY” isn’t personal.

It’s not a rejection of your team.

It’s an invitation to improve — and align with the ecosystem’s deeper needs.

Let’s build better. Together. 🫶

XXXXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics $2824m $5dot $1588myear drops staking $90m $500m

Post Link

post/tweet::1945877908087607383
/post/tweet::1945877908087607383