[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Summa Silver [@SummaSilver](/creator/twitter/SummaSilver) on x 2258 followers Created: 2025-07-17 15:18:03 UTC Drilling is in full swing at Red Mountain 🏌️♀️ The focus is to expand the 168.6M oz silver equivalent¹ resource by testing new high-impact targets, including critical minerals like zinc, copper, tin, antimony, and gallium—key for US supply chains 🔑 $SSVR $SSVRF $AGA.V 🔉 ¹ For important notes on mineral resource estimates, please refer to Page XX → * Notes to Silver47 Mineral Resources: The 2024 Red Mountain MRE was estimated and classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) “Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines” dated November 29, 2019, and the CIM “Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” dated May 10, 2014. X. Mr. Warren Black, P.Geo. of APEX Geoscience Ltd., a QP as defined by NI 43-101, is responsible for completing the 2024 Mineral Resource Estimate, effective January 12, 2024. X. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves have not demonstrated economic viability. No mineral reserves have been calculated for Red Mountain. There is no guarantee that any part of the mineral resources discussed herein will be converted to a mineral reserve in the future. X. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, market, or other relevant factors. X. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Resources is uncertain, and there has not been sufficient work to define the Inferred Mineral Resource as an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource. It is reasonably expected that most of the Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration. X. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Reported grades are undiluted. X. A standard density of XXXX g/cm³ is assumed for mineralized material and waste rock. Overburden density is set at XXX g/cm³. For mineralized material blocks with iron assays close enough to estimate an iron value for the block, density is calculated using the formula: density (g/cm³) = XXXXXX * Fe (%) + XXXXXX. X. Metal prices are US$2,750/tonne Zn, US$2,100/tonne Pb, US$8,880/tonne Cu, US$1,850/oz Au, and US$23/oz Ag. X. Recoveries are XX% Zn, XX% Pb, XX% Cu, XX% Ag, and XX% Au. XX. ZnEQ (%) = [Zn (%) x 1] + [Pb (%) x 0.6364] + [Cu (%) x 2.4889] + [Ag (ppm) x 0.0209] + [Au (ppm) x 0.1923] XX. AgEQ (ppm) = [Zn (%) x 47.81] + [Pb (%) x 30.43] + [Cu (%) x 119] + [Ag (ppm) x 1] + [Au (ppm) x 91.93] XX. Open-pit resource economic assumptions are US$3/tonne for mining mineralized and waste material, US$19/tonne for processing, and 48° pit slopes. XX. Underground resource economic assumptions are US$50/tonne for mining mineralized and waste material and US$19/tonne for processing. XX. Open-pit resources comprise blocks constrained by the pit shell resulting from the pseudoflow optimization using the open-pit economic assumptions. XX. Underground resources comprise blocks below the open-pit shell that form minable shapes. They must be contained in domains of a minimum width of XXX m at Dry Creek or X m height at West Tundra Flats. Resources not meeting these size criteria are included if, once diluted to the required size, maintain a grade above the cutoff. XX. Equivalencies are calculated using ratios with metal prices of US$2,750/tonne Zn, US$2,100/tonne Pb, US$8,880/tonne Cu, US$1,850/oz Au, and US$23/oz Ag and recoveries of XX% Zn, XX% Pb, XX% Cu, XX% Ag, and XX% Au. AgEq* (g/t) = [Zn (%) x 47.81] + [Pb (%) x 30.43] + [Cu (%) x 119] + [Ag (g/t) x 1] + [Au (g/t) x 91.93]  XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [$agav](/topic/$agav) [$ssvrf](/topic/$ssvrf) [$ssvr](/topic/$ssvr) [copper](/topic/copper) [zinc](/topic/zinc) [Post Link](https://x.com/SummaSilver/status/1945865589509255617)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Summa Silver @SummaSilver on x 2258 followers
Created: 2025-07-17 15:18:03 UTC
Drilling is in full swing at Red Mountain 🏌️♀️ The focus is to expand the 168.6M oz silver equivalent¹ resource by testing new high-impact targets, including critical minerals like zinc, copper, tin, antimony, and gallium—key for US supply chains 🔑 $SSVR $SSVRF $AGA.V 🔉
¹ For important notes on mineral resource estimates, please refer to Page XX →
- Notes to Silver47 Mineral Resources: The 2024 Red Mountain MRE was estimated and classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) “Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines” dated November 29, 2019, and the CIM “Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” dated May 10, 2014. X. Mr. Warren Black, P.Geo. of APEX Geoscience Ltd., a QP as defined by NI 43-101, is responsible for completing the 2024 Mineral Resource Estimate, effective January 12, 2024. X. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves have not demonstrated economic viability. No mineral reserves have been calculated for Red Mountain. There is no guarantee that any part of the mineral resources discussed herein will be converted to a mineral reserve in the future. X. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, market, or other relevant factors. X. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred Resources is uncertain, and there has not been sufficient work to define the Inferred Mineral Resource as an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource. It is reasonably expected that most of the Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration. X. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Reported grades are undiluted. X. A standard density of XXXX g/cm³ is assumed for mineralized material and waste rock. Overburden density is set at XXX g/cm³. For mineralized material blocks with iron assays close enough to estimate an iron value for the block, density is calculated using the formula: density (g/cm³) = XXXXXX * Fe (%) + XXXXXX. X. Metal prices are US$2,750/tonne Zn, US$2,100/tonne Pb, US$8,880/tonne Cu, US$1,850/oz Au, and US$23/oz Ag. X. Recoveries are XX% Zn, XX% Pb, XX% Cu, XX% Ag, and XX% Au. XX. ZnEQ (%) = [Zn (%) x 1] + [Pb (%) x 0.6364] + [Cu (%) x 2.4889] + [Ag (ppm) x 0.0209] + [Au (ppm) x 0.1923] XX. AgEQ (ppm) = [Zn (%) x 47.81] + [Pb (%) x 30.43] + [Cu (%) x 119] + [Ag (ppm) x 1] + [Au (ppm) x 91.93] XX. Open-pit resource economic assumptions are US$3/tonne for mining mineralized and waste material, US$19/tonne for processing, and 48° pit slopes. XX. Underground resource economic assumptions are US$50/tonne for mining mineralized and waste material and US$19/tonne for processing. XX. Open-pit resources comprise blocks constrained by the pit shell resulting from the pseudoflow optimization using the open-pit economic assumptions. XX. Underground resources comprise blocks below the open-pit shell that form minable shapes. They must be contained in domains of a minimum width of XXX m at Dry Creek or X m height at West Tundra Flats. Resources not meeting these size criteria are included if, once diluted to the required size, maintain a grade above the cutoff. XX. Equivalencies are calculated using ratios with metal prices of US$2,750/tonne Zn, US$2,100/tonne Pb, US$8,880/tonne Cu, US$1,850/oz Au, and US$23/oz Ag and recoveries of XX% Zn, XX% Pb, XX% Cu, XX% Ag, and XX% Au. AgEq* (g/t) = [Zn (%) x 47.81] + [Pb (%) x 30.43] + [Cu (%) x 119] + [Ag (g/t) x 1] + [Au (g/t) x 91.93]
XXX engagements
