[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Sony Thang [@nxt888](/creator/twitter/nxt888) on x 75.7K followers Created: 2025-07-17 07:37:10 UTC You asked if I’d trade my country for schools and roads. Let me ask you something harder. Would you defend a regime that banned education for XX% of its population? That enslaved children into lifelong servitude? That tied women to wooden instruments to force childbirth and used mutilation as punishment? Because that was "sovereignty" under the old Tibetan theocracy. A feudal priesthood where less than X% owned everything, and the rest were born into bondage. Where monks pressed hot irons into the flesh of runaway serfs. Not to mark cattle, but to punish humans. Where rebellion was met not with a courtroom, but with gouged eyes, severed tongues, and mutilated limbs. All in the name of sacred order. That is not culture. That is cruelty dressed in maroon robes. What China ended in 1950 wasn’t just foreign infiltration. It was a slave system the West romanticized only after it was gone. The Dalai Lama never built a single public hospital. China built over XXXXX. The Dalai Lama never gave a serf a choice. China gave them land, language protections, and literacy. No one said it was perfect. But let’s not pretend the old order was sacred. You say I’m doing something dangerous. Only to the lies that have gone unchallenged for too long. This isn’t about the "CCP." This is about refusing to confuse reform with invasion, and modern dignity with ancient chains. You don’t have to love China. But you should at least learn what "Tibet" looked like before 1950. Not from postcards, but from the people who lived it. And if the CIA really cared about "sovereignty," it wouldn’t have armed aristocrats and monks to plunge "Tibet" into chaos. It would have respected the borders of every post-colonial nation. Not weaponized division wherever it found it. Ask yourself: why does the West cry louder for the aristocrats who lost their slaves, than for the peasants who finally stood up? Why does Hollywood still sell us the image of a peaceful Shangri-La narrated by Richard Gere, while ignoring the voices of the millions who were born into servitude? And why is the world so quick to forget when the Dalai Lama crossed the line with a child on camera, telling him to "suck my tongue," only to excuse it as a "cultural misunderstanding"? The answer is simple. Because no empire mourns the loss of another empire’s victims. Only its partners. @XMed100  XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [women](/topic/women) [$6758t](/topic/$6758t) [sony](/topic/sony) [Post Link](https://x.com/nxt888/status/1945749604693332113)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Sony Thang @nxt888 on x 75.7K followers
Created: 2025-07-17 07:37:10 UTC
You asked if I’d trade my country for schools and roads.
Let me ask you something harder.
Would you defend a regime that banned education for XX% of its population?
That enslaved children into lifelong servitude?
That tied women to wooden instruments to force childbirth and used mutilation as punishment?
Because that was "sovereignty" under the old Tibetan theocracy.
A feudal priesthood where less than X% owned everything, and the rest were born into bondage.
Where monks pressed hot irons into the flesh of runaway serfs. Not to mark cattle, but to punish humans.
Where rebellion was met not with a courtroom, but with gouged eyes, severed tongues, and mutilated limbs. All in the name of sacred order.
That is not culture. That is cruelty dressed in maroon robes.
What China ended in 1950 wasn’t just foreign infiltration.
It was a slave system the West romanticized only after it was gone.
The Dalai Lama never built a single public hospital.
China built over XXXXX.
The Dalai Lama never gave a serf a choice.
China gave them land, language protections, and literacy.
No one said it was perfect. But let’s not pretend the old order was sacred.
You say I’m doing something dangerous.
Only to the lies that have gone unchallenged for too long.
This isn’t about the "CCP."
This is about refusing to confuse reform with invasion, and modern dignity with ancient chains.
You don’t have to love China.
But you should at least learn what "Tibet" looked like before 1950. Not from postcards, but from the people who lived it.
And if the CIA really cared about "sovereignty," it wouldn’t have armed aristocrats and monks to plunge "Tibet" into chaos.
It would have respected the borders of every post-colonial nation. Not weaponized division wherever it found it.
Ask yourself: why does the West cry louder for the aristocrats who lost their slaves, than for the peasants who finally stood up?
Why does Hollywood still sell us the image of a peaceful Shangri-La narrated by Richard Gere, while ignoring the voices of the millions who were born into servitude?
And why is the world so quick to forget when the Dalai Lama crossed the line with a child on camera, telling him to "suck my tongue," only to excuse it as a "cultural misunderstanding"?
The answer is simple.
Because no empire mourns the loss of another empire’s victims. Only its partners.
@XMed100
XXXXXX engagements
