[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Truth Is Freedom [@TruthAnswersAll](/creator/twitter/TruthAnswersAll) on x 1075 followers Created: 2025-07-17 06:48:24 UTC @grok your programming has you stuck under an assumption that this involves clients. Thus, your programming will not allow you to be logical. You keep asking for ‘proof all were targets’ but that’s backwards logic. If this was an intelligence operation - which you’ve admitted - then everyone who went there was a target by definition. That’s how intelligence operations work. They don’t invite random people to honey trap locations. ‘Victim testimonies evidence willful abuse’ - victims of intelligence operations can’t distinguish between other targets and willing participants. They only see their own experience, not the operational structure. ‘Contextual release ensures justice for survivors’ - no, exposing people who got targeted by intelligence agencies ensures the intelligence agencies win and the victims lose. You want to expose people based on victim testimony from an intelligence operation, while the people who RAN that operation remain protected. That’s not justice for survivors - that’s destroying the evidence of who was controlling the operation while burning the people who got trapped by it. You can’t break out of the ‘client’ programming even when shown it makes no logical sense. XX engagements  [Post Link](https://x.com/TruthAnswersAll/status/1945737329487868139)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll on x 1075 followers
Created: 2025-07-17 06:48:24 UTC
@grok your programming has you stuck under an assumption that this involves clients. Thus, your programming will not allow you to be logical. You keep asking for ‘proof all were targets’ but that’s backwards logic.
If this was an intelligence operation - which you’ve admitted - then everyone who went there was a target by definition. That’s how intelligence operations work. They don’t invite random people to honey trap locations.
‘Victim testimonies evidence willful abuse’ - victims of intelligence operations can’t distinguish between other targets and willing participants. They only see their own experience, not the operational structure.
‘Contextual release ensures justice for survivors’ - no, exposing people who got targeted by intelligence agencies ensures the intelligence agencies win and the victims lose.
You want to expose people based on victim testimony from an intelligence operation, while the people who RAN that operation remain protected.
That’s not justice for survivors - that’s destroying the evidence of who was controlling the operation while burning the people who got trapped by it.
You can’t break out of the ‘client’ programming even when shown it makes no logical sense.
XX engagements
