[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![Tanner_Invests Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1881519554716909568.png) Tanner Invests [@Tanner_Invests](/creator/twitter/Tanner_Invests) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-17 02:26:44 UTC

Yes, this is my point. It is inherently skewed where a company that "cares" and is "savvy enough" can have a higher score than a customer that does not. 

It's just like polling. If FOX news runs a poll on Trump performance - do you think it will outperform a poll from CNN? Yes. 

Review sites have the same flaws. Listen, I like your content I just have a cringe reaction for review sites like this. It's impossible to compare customer sentiment off an online review site of INSURANCE.

Another skewed example and counterpoint Robinhood. Do you not think Vlad / Robinhood "care" at all or are "savvy enough"? They have a XXX Star rating on TrustPilot. They are BELOVED by their user base. This point with Robinhood alone proves that review sites like TrustPilo shouldn't be any reason whatsoever to make an investment or not.


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1945671481301615044/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[fox news](/topic/fox-news)
[donald trump](/topic/donald-trump)
[savvy](/topic/savvy)

[Post Link](https://x.com/Tanner_Invests/status/1945671481301615044)