[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Stavrogin 🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦🇵🇸🇮🇱 [@PinheadKing](/creator/twitter/PinheadKing) on x 3696 followers Created: 2025-07-16 17:31:50 UTC Alright guys, still no news of a major event on the biopsy, so assuming the least bad scenario picture this We will discuss the most provocative cases at the Supreme Court in recent memory And (again I'm still gauging how insane people will get), how about starting with Dobbs, yes? Let's see if we can present the case as more informative than main steam media does. Now, I'm not saying you will change your mind. (Especially if you're a woman or on the left.) I'm not attempting to do that. What I'm trying to do is teach you a more sophisticated way of seeing and moving. You can still oppose Dobbs and not reach for ludicrous Handmaid Tale constructions. You can oppose Dobbs and not relegate Amy Coney Barrett to being a traitor to all women. And the best part is, with the people who really matter, you should be much more persuasive and isn't that what you want? You want to move power back and recognize the hurt you feel. I'm not taking that away. I also give you alternative means of looking at the problem. And yes @VarvyPetrovna and many others will shit on those alts and fine. I'm not saying those are easy roads by any stretch. But screaming at projections is not a road at all. XX engagements  **Related Topics** [steam](/topic/steam) [supreme court](/topic/supreme-court) [supreme](/topic/supreme) [Post Link](https://x.com/PinheadKing/status/1945536868658929838)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Stavrogin 🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇦🇵🇸🇮🇱 @PinheadKing on x 3696 followers
Created: 2025-07-16 17:31:50 UTC
Alright guys, still no news of a major event on the biopsy, so assuming the least bad scenario picture this
We will discuss the most provocative cases at the Supreme Court in recent memory
And (again I'm still gauging how insane people will get), how about starting with Dobbs, yes? Let's see if we can present the case as more informative than main steam media does.
Now, I'm not saying you will change your mind. (Especially if you're a woman or on the left.) I'm not attempting to do that. What I'm trying to do is teach you a more sophisticated way of seeing and moving.
You can still oppose Dobbs and not reach for ludicrous Handmaid Tale constructions. You can oppose Dobbs and not relegate Amy Coney Barrett to being a traitor to all women. And the best part is, with the people who really matter, you should be much more persuasive and isn't that what you want?
You want to move power back and recognize the hurt you feel. I'm not taking that away.
I also give you alternative means of looking at the problem. And yes @VarvyPetrovna and many others will shit on those alts and fine. I'm not saying those are easy roads by any stretch. But screaming at projections is not a road at all.
XX engagements
Related Topics steam supreme court supreme